首页> 外文OA文献 >Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Assessing an Elusive Construct
【2h】

Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Assessing an Elusive Construct

机译:建构主义探究的真实性:评估一种难以捉摸的建构

摘要

Methodological rigor in constructivist inquiry is established through an assessment of trustworthiness and authenticity. Trustworthiness parallels the positivistic concepts of internal and external validity, focusing on an assessment of the inquiry process. Authenticity, however, is unique to constructivist inquiry and has no parallel in the positivistic paradigm. Authenticity involves an assessment of the meaningfulness and usefulness of interactive inquiry processes and social change that results from these processes. However, the techniques for ascertaining authenticity are in the early stages of development. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe a process for assessing authenticity in a constructivist inquiry. A brief overview of constructivist inquiries are described in relation to a set of techniques designed specifically to assess five dimensions of authenticity. Implications for constructivist researchers and social work research are presented.
机译:建构主义探究的方法论严谨性是通过对可信度和真实性的评估而建立的。诚信与内部和外部有效性的实证主义概念平行,侧重于对询问过程的评估。然而,真实性是建构主义探究所独有的,在实证主义范式中没有类似之处。真实性包括对交互式询问过程以及由这些过程导致的社会变化的意义和有用性的评估。但是,确定真实性的技术仍处于开发的早期阶段。因此,本文的目的是描述一种在建构主义探究中评估真实性的过程。相对于专门设计用来评估真实性的五个维度的一组技术,对建构主义的研究进行了简要概述。提出了对建构主义研究人员和社会工作研究的启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号