Three different variations of PSO algorithms, i.e. Canonical, GaussianBare-bone and L'evy Bare-bone PSO, are tested to optimize the ultimate oilrecovery of a large heavy oil reservoir. The performance of these algorithmswas compared in terms of convergence behaviour and the final optimizationresults. It is found that, in general, all three types of PSO methods are ableto improve the objective function. The best objective function is found byusing the Canonical PSO, while the other two methods give similar results. TheGaussian Bare-bone PSO may picks positions that are far away from the optimalsolution. The L'evy Bare-bone PSO has similar convergence behaviour as theCanonical PSO. For the specific optimization problem investigated in thisstudy, it is found that the temperature of the injection steam, CO2 compositionin the injection gas, and the gas injection rates have bigger impact on theobjective function, while steam injection rate and the liquid production ratehave less impact on the objective function.
展开▼
机译:PSO算法的三种不同变化,即Canonical,Gaussianbare-Bone和L 'Evy Bare-BeSo,以优化大型重油储层的终极油收冻结。在收敛行为和最终优化方面比较了这些算法上的性能。结果发现,通常,所有三种类型的PSO方法都是EBLETO改善目标函数。通过典型的PSO找到最佳目标函数,而另外两种方法则提供类似的结果。 TheGaussian裸骨PSO可以选择远离Optimalolution的位置。 L 'evy裸骨PSO具有与TheCanonical PSO类似的收敛行为。对于在鉴定中进行研究的特定优化问题,发现注射蒸汽,CO2组合物的温度,注射气体,以及气体注射率对无目标功能较大,而蒸汽喷射率和液体生产率较小影响目标函数。
展开▼