首页> 外文OA文献 >Trade in Environmental Goods: A Review of the WTO Appellate Body's Ruling in US‒Countervailing Measures (China)
【2h】

Trade in Environmental Goods: A Review of the WTO Appellate Body's Ruling in US‒Countervailing Measures (China)

机译:环境商品贸易:在美国反补贴措施中对WTO上诉机构统治的综述(中国)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we claim that, in the WTO Appellate Body (AB)’s ruling in US-Countervailing Measures (China), the AB decision has essentially left unchanged the practice of imposing countervailing duties (CVDs) on environmental goods. While the US has formally “lost” the case, a change in the procedures and tests used to motivate the CVD will allow the US to continue using this policy tool. From an economic point of view, this is not welcome news since CVDs have the standard distortionary effects of tariffs and could go against environmental goals. From a political-economy point of view, the CVDs in this case appear driven by pressure of domestic manufacturers of clean energy technology and products.
机译:在本文中,我们声称,在WTO上诉机构(AB)在美国反补贴措施(中国)中,AB决定基本上没有改变了对环境商品施加反补贴责任(CVDS)的实践。虽然美国正式“丢失”案例,但用于激励CVD的程序和测试的变化将允许我们继续使用此策略工具。从经济角度来看,这是不欢迎新闻,因为CVDS具有关税的标准扭曲效果,并可能违反环境目标。从政治经济角度来看,在这种情况下,CVDS出现在清洁能源技术和产品的国内厂商的压力驱动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号