首页> 外文OA文献 >Prediction of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms by Serum Pepsinogen Assay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
【2h】

Prediction of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms by Serum Pepsinogen Assay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

机译:血清胃肠原测定慢性萎缩性胃炎和胃肿瘤的预测:诊断测试精度的系统综述与荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Serum pepsinogen assay (sPGA), which reveals serum pepsinogen (PG) I concentration and the PG I/PG II ratio, is a non-invasive test for predicting chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and gastric neoplasms. Although various cut-off values have been suggested, PG I ≤70 ng/mL and a PG I/PG II ratio of ≤3 have been proposed. However, previous meta-analyses reported insufficient systematic reviews and only pooled outcomes, which cannot determine the diagnostic validity of sPGA with a cut-off value of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and/or PG I/PG II ratio ≤3. We searched the core databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase) from their inception to April 2018. Fourteen and 43 studies were identified and analyzed for the diagnostic performance in CAG and gastric neoplasms, respectively. Values for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve with a cut-off value of PG I ≤70 ng/mL and PG I/PG II ratio ≤3 to diagnose CAG were 0.59, 0.89, 12, and 0.81, respectively and for diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) these values were 0.59, 0.73, 4, and 0.7, respectively. Methodological quality and ethnicity of enrolled studies were found to be the reason for the heterogeneity in CAG diagnosis. Considering the high specificity, non-invasiveness, and easily interpretable characteristics, sPGA has potential for screening of CAG or GC.
机译:血清胃蛋白酶原测定法(SPGA),其揭示了血清胃蛋白酶原(PG)I浓度和PG I / PG II比,是用于预测慢性萎缩性胃炎(CAG)和胃肿瘤的非侵入性测试。尽管各种截止值已经被建议,PG I≤70ng / mL和的≤3一个PG I / PG II比已经被提出。然而,以往的荟萃分析报道不足系统评价和只汇集结果,不能确定与PG I≤70ng / mL和/或PG I / PG II比≤3的截止值SPGA的诊断有效性。我们搜查从一开始的核心数据库(MEDLINE,Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE)至四月十四2018年和43项试验,并分别分析了在CAG和胃肿瘤的诊断价值。对于灵敏度,特异性,诊断比值比,以及曲线下面积与PG I≤70ng / mL和PG I / PG II比的截止值的值≤3诊断CAG分别为0.59,0.89,图12,和0.81分别和胃癌(GC)的诊断这些值分别为0.59,0.73,图4,和0.7,分别。方法学质量,并参加研究的种族被认为是在CAG诊断的异质性的原因。考虑到高特异性,非侵入性,并且容易解释的特点,SPGA对CAG或GC的筛选潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号