首页> 外文OA文献 >A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity
【2h】

A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity

机译:理解谈判伦理伦理性别差异的社会认知方法:道德认同的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To date, gender differences in ethics have received little theoretical attention. We utilize a social-cognitive framework to explain why these differences emerge and when women engage in less unethical negotiating behavior than do men. We propose that, relative to men, women’s stronger moral identities suppress unethical negotiating behavior. Study 1 establishes a gender difference in moral identity strength through a meta-analysis of over 19,000 people. Study 2 observes gender differences in two aspects of negotiator ethics – moral disengagement and opportunism. Study 3 establishes moral identity strength as an antecedent to negotiator ethics. Finally, Studies 4 and 5 explore financial incentives as a situational moderator. Because financial incentives temporarily decrease the salience of moral identity, they could mitigate gender differences in negotiator ethics, leading women to act more like men. Across both studies, financial incentives impacted women’s (but not men’s) unethical negotiating behavior. Our findings help to explain why and when gender differences in ethics emerge.
机译:迄今为止,道德的性别差异受到了很少的理论关注。我们利用社会认知框架来解释为什么这些差异出现,当女性从事比男性不太不道德的谈判行为。我们建议,相对于男性,女性更强的道德身份抑制了不道德的谈判行为。研究1通过超过19,000人的荟萃分析来建立道德身份强度的性别差异。研究2观察谈判者伦理的两个方面的性别差异 - 道德脱离和机会主义。研究3将道德身份强度建立为谈判者伦理的先行者。最后,研究4和5探索金融激励作为一种情况主持人。由于财务激励措施暂时降低了道德身份的显着性,因此他们可以减轻谈判者道德的性别差异,导致女性更像男人。在这两个研究中,金融激励受到影响的女性(但不是男性)不道德的谈判行为。我们的研究结果有助于解释原因和伦理中的性别差异出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号