首页> 外文OA文献 >Technical standards, standards-setting organizations, and intellectual property: a survey of the literature (with an emphasis on empirical approaches)
【2h】

Technical standards, standards-setting organizations, and intellectual property: a survey of the literature (with an emphasis on empirical approaches)

机译:技术标准,标准制定组织和知识产权:文献调查(重点是实证方法)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Important theoretical work relating to standards has been done in the areas of SSO dynamics, firm behavior, market effects of patents, and royalty pricing. This work has been supplemented by a significant body of research and empirical data on the acquisition and disclosure of patents within SSOs, particularly in the ICT sector. Several important catalogs and analyses of SSO patent policies now exist, together with rich databases of SSO membership and policy data. Despite this large body of literature, there are numerous areas at the confluence of intellectual property and standardization that warrant further investigation. These include: the influence and internal organization of consortia and other informal standards groups; the prevalence and market impact of de jure and de facto royalty-free standards; the effect of patents on standardization in growing fields outside of ICT including clean technology, medical devices and automotive infrastructure; the interaction of technology standards with open source software; the impact of product certification and certification marks on technology products and markets; and the institutional, legal and policy landscape of standardization outside of North America and Europe, particularly in China and other Asian economies. In addition, more public data is needed regarding patent licensing and royalty rates for standardized technologies. The data that currently exists is gleaned largely from public sources such as litigation records, government licenses and public securities filings. This data, however, represents only the tip of the iceberg. The largest and most meaningful accumulation of data concerning patent licensing is locked within the files of private firms, subject to strict confidentiality restrictions, and beyond the reach of researchers, policy makers, enforcement agencies and courts. Greater public access to this data has the potential to lower licensing transaction costs, reduce the number of disputes regarding FRAND royalty rates, improve the accuracy of judicial damages determinations, inform agency enforcement decisions, and improve policy making. As such, it is in the interest of all participants in the standardization ecosystem to contribute to the growing public data resources in this important area of economic activity.
机译:与标准有关的重要理论工作已经在SSO动态,坚定的行为,专利市场影响和版税定价的领域进行。这项工作得到了关于在SSO内收购和披露专利的重要研究和经验数据,特别是在ICT部门。现在存在一些重要的目录和SSO专利策略的分析,以及丰富的SSO成员资格和策略数据数据库。尽管存在这一大型文学,但知识产权交汇处有许多领域,并提供进一步调查的标准化。这些包括:联盟的影响和内部组织和其他非正式标准组; De Jure和Facto ViteSta的普遍存在和市场影响;专利对ICT外,包括清洁技术,医疗器械和汽车基础设施在内的生长领域的标准化效果;技术标准与开源软件的互动;产品认证和认证标志对技术产品和市场的影响;以及北美及欧洲以外标准化的制度,法律和政策景观,特别是在中国和其他亚洲经济体中。此外,有关标准化技术的专利许可和版税税率需要更多的公共数据。目前存在的数据主要来自诉讼记录,政府许可证和公共证券申请等公共来源。但是,此数据仅代表冰山的尖端。关于专利许可的数据最大,最有意义的数据累积被锁定在私营企业的文件中,而受严格的保密限制,超出了研究人员,政策制定者,执法机构和法院的范围。更广泛的公众获取此数据有可能降低许可交易成本,减少关于额定符合符合税率的争议的数量,提高司法损害决定的准确性,通知机构执法决定,改善政策制定。因此,符合标准化生态系统的所有参与者的利益,促进了在这一重要的经济活动领域中越来越多的公共数据资源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jorge L. Contreras;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号