首页> 外文OA文献 >Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
【2h】

Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial

机译:慢性护理患者赋予患者改善糖尿病窘迫和血糖控制:杂交实施效果临床试验的议定书

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal‐setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics. Design Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the EPIC intervention with enhanced usual care (EUC) at five clinic sites located in the greater Chicago and Houston areas. We will measure differences in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes distress scale scores among study arms at post‐intervention and maintenance (6 months post‐intervention). We will evaluate implementation of the intervention across sites using the RE‐AIM framework. We will evaluate reach by comparing the per cent and characteristics of enrolled study participants among all potentially eligible participants in the given clinic population. Adoption is reflected by the characteristics of the involved providers and the number of intervention sessions conducted. Implementation of EPIC will be evaluated by number of sessions delivered, participants' evaluation of group sessions, and evaluation of quality of goal‐setting. Patients We randomized 280 participants with equal allocation to EPIC and enhanced usual care (EUC). Results At baseline, the groups were similar with the exception that EUC participants were more likely to have prior diabetes education. At baseline, participants were predominately older men who have poorly controlled diabetes (mean HbA1c = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%]) and moderate levels of diabetes distress (mean DDS = 2.43). Conclusions This hybrid effectiveness‐implementation protocol is designed to accelerate the translation of a patient‐centred diabetes care intervention from research to clinical practice.
机译:摘要目的,评价协作目标干预的有效性(慢性护理患者[EPIC]),改善血糖控制和糖尿病的痛苦,并在多次初级保健诊所进行常规护理。设计随机对照试验比较了史诗干预在大芝加哥和休斯顿地区的五个临床网站上进行了增强的常规护理(EUC)的有效性。我们将测量血红蛋白A1C(HBA1C)和糖尿病在干预后和维护后(干预后6个月)之间的血红蛋白A1C(HBA1C)和糖尿病痛苦评分。我们将使用重新瞄准框架评估跨网站干预的实施。我们将通过比较给定诊所人口中所有可能符合条件的参与者中的招收研究参与者的百分比和特征来评估范围。通过涉及提供者的特征和所进行的干预课程的特征反映。史诗的实施将由交付的会议数量,参与者对集团会议评估的数量进行评估,评估目标设置的质量。患者我们随机分配280名参与者,同等分配到史诗和常规护理(EUC)。结果在基线上,该组与EUC参与者更有可能具有先前糖尿病教育的情况相似。在基线时,参与者主要是糖尿病控制不佳的年龄较大的男性(平均HBA1C = 76mmol / mol [9.1%])和中等水平的糖尿病窘迫(平均dds = 2.43)。结论这种混合有效性 - 实施方案旨在加速患者患者中心糖尿病护理干预的翻译,从研究临床实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号