首页> 外文OA文献 >Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
【2h】

Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis

机译:Genexpert MTB / RIF测定与常规方法诊断肺癌和外肺结核诊断方法的诊断效用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (T.B) is one of the major infectious diseases in the developing countries. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary T.B (EPTB) remains problematic and emergence of resistant strains poses a significant threat. Improved diagnosis of tuberculosis is a global priority for proper control. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) and EPTB and to evaluate the performance of GeneXpert system for demonstrating rifampicin resistance among the studied patients. Methods A total of 582 clinical samples (449 pulmonary; 430 sputum and 19 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and 133 extra-pulmonary origins; 26 pleural fluid, 62 CSF, 19 ascetic fluid, 12 pus and 14 urine) were collected from patients under clinical and radiological assessment of either PTB or EPTB who were admitted to Menoufia Chest Hospital over a period of three years. Clinical samples were processed and investigated for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) by both Xpert assay and the conventional methods including Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN)/acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear microscopy and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture. Patients′ demographic, clinical characteristics and risk factors for acquiring rifampicin resistance were analyzed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, false- negative rate and total accuracy of AFB smear microscopy respectively were 72.1 %, 81.3 %, 27.9 and 78.8 % for PTB. However for EPTB, they were 63.2 %, 70.5 %, 36.8 and 68.4 % respectively in relation to LJ culture as the gold standard. GeneXpert MTB/RIF revealed better performance for PTB than EPTB. For PTB, it showed 90.2 % sensitivity, 86.9 % specificity, and 9.8 % false- negative rate. For EPTB, the assay showed a sensitivity of 81.6 %, specificity of 78.9 % and false- negative rate of 18.5 %. Multivariate regression analysis showed that presence of EPTB and contacts with known TB cases were independent risk factors for developing rifampicin resistance. Conclusions GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid and highly sensitive technique for diagnosis of PTB or EPTB. Its simplicity and accuracy make this new method a very impressive tool for diagnosis of MTB and rifampicin resistance.
机译:摘要背景结核(T.B)是发展中国家的主要传染病之一。外胰膜(EPTB)的诊断仍然存在问题,抗性菌株的出现构成了重大威胁。改善了结核病的诊断是适当控制的全球优先事项。该研究旨在评估Genexpert MTB / RIF测定的诊断准确性,用于诊断肺结核(PTB)和EPTB的诊断,并评估Genexpert系统的性能,用于展示研究患者的利福平耐药性。方法总共582种临床样品(449肺部; 430痰和19条支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)和133种肺部起源;在临床下的患者中收集了26例胸腔液,62个CSF,19次腹水,12个脓液和14个尿液)在三年内被录取为Menoufia Chest医院的PTB或EPTB的放射性评估。加工临床样品并研究了通过Xpert测定和常规方法检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB),包括Ziehl-Neelsen(Zn)/酸 - 快杆菌(AFB)涂片显微镜和Lowenstein-Jensen(LJ)培养物。分析了患者的人口统计学,临床特征和用于获取利福平抗性的临床特征和危险因素。结果PTB分别为72.1%,81.3%,27.9和78.8%的敏感性,特异性,假阴性率和总精度分别为72.1%,81.3%,27.9和78.8%。然而,对于EPTB,他们分别为LJ文化作为黄金标准的63.2%,70.5%,36.8%和68.4%。 Genexpert MTB / RIF显示PTB的性能比EPTB更好。对于PTB,它表现出90.2%的灵敏度,86.9%的特异性和9.8%的假阴性率。对于EPTB,测定显示敏感性为81.6%,特异性为78.9%,假阴性率为18.5%。多元回归分析显示EPTB的存在和已知结核病病例的触点是用于显影利福平抗性的独立危险因素。结论Genexpert MTB / RIF测定是一种快速且高度敏感的PTB或EPTB技术。其简单性和准确性使得这种新方法是一种令人印象深刻的诊断MTB和利福平抗性的工具。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号