首页> 外文OA文献 >How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios
【2h】

How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios

机译:我们如何教授医学生明智地选择?基于文本的案例场景的随机控制的交叉研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome. Methods In a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam. Results Of 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk. Conclusion Repeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process.
机译:摘要背景选择明智的竞选突出了临床推理能力对称职和反思医生的重要性。本科的本科医学教育应解决这一运动的原则。最近的研究表明,回答有关患者管理中重要步骤的问题促进了知识保留。它不太清楚是否通过纳入视频提高教育材料的真实性进一步增强了学习结果。方法在预期随机控制的交叉研究中,我们评估了是否在培训学生选择适当的诊断测试中的重复基于文本的测试更有效的基于视频的测试更有效,到达正确的诊断并确定可明智的疗法。在进入考试后,第四年本科医学院参加了10周的计算机研讨会,在此期间研究了病例历史。每种情况都包含了诊断和治疗所呈现的患者的五个关键特征问题(项目)。学生被随机分配读取文本案例(控制条件)或观看视频(干预),并且每周在组之间切换到文本或视频的分配。使用内部设计内容,在第一次学期后,评估了33周(退出考试)和9个月(保留测试)上的学生表现。主要结果是在出口考试中基于视频和基于文本的项目的性能的主题差异。结果125名符合条件的学生,93个为所有三个考试提供数据(响应率为74.4%)。基于视频的评分比出口检查中的文本物品百分比显着更高(76.2±19.4%,P = 0.026)但不保留试验(69.2±20.2%与66.4±20.3 %,p = 0.108)。对该保留测试的额外贝叶斯分析表明,基于视频的培训比长期的基于文本的培训更有效(贝叶斯因子2.36)。无论呈现格式如何,学生反应都揭示了错误的信念的普遍性,如果应用于临床环境,可以将患者放在风险上。结论与基于文本的测试相比,重复的基于视频的关键特征测试会产生卓越的短期学习结果。鉴于误解的普及率高,有必要努力改善医学教育临床推理培训。选择明智的竞选活动使自己成为这个过程的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号