首页> 外文OA文献 >Some Perspectives on Managing Water Demand: Public and Expert Views
【2h】

Some Perspectives on Managing Water Demand: Public and Expert Views

机译:关于管理需水需求的一些观点:公共和专家意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An investigation was undertaken to explore two aspects of water demand management strategies. The first aspect involved comparing and contrasting the public's and expert's perceptions of various water demand management techniques. The second part of the study involved an examination of people's attitudes, behaviors, motivations and satisfactions with regard to water conservation. A survey was conducted which collected data from a random sample of citizens in the communities of Kitchener and Waterloo, Ontario and from the participants in a symposium on water demand management. Data from the 39 public respondents and the 33 expert respondents were analyzed. The results of the comparative analysis indicated that the experts perceive rate structure strategies as being more effective than do the public. Although both groups rated education strategies significantly higher than other demand management options, the experts tended to underestimate the full extent of the public's belief in reduction. Data from the respondents were also subjected to dimensional analysis and relationships between the dimensions were examined. The results indicate that people hold not one but several conservation related attitudes and they report deriving a series of separate and distinct intrinsic satisfactions from conservation behaviors. These intrinsic satisfactions were not global concepts but were quite specific involving, for instance, frugality and participation. These findings have both practical and theoretical relevance. The practical benefits come from the potential to devise more effective demand management techniques. It would seem wise to avoid developing water demand programs which are based upon preconceptions of what the public thinks. It is more effective, and less embarrassing, to discover the differences between the public's and the experts' knowledge and preference structure during development of a program than to have these differences surface during implementation of one's plan. Our theoretical understanding of why people bother to adopt environmental stewardship behaviors may be improved by investigating more than just attitude-behavior consistency or the effects of extrinsic rewards. More research attention should be given to intrinsic satisfactions derived from environmentally appropriate behavior.
机译:开展了调查,探讨水需求管理策略的两个方面。第一个方面涉及比较和对比公众和专家对各种水需求管理技术的看法。该研究的第二部分涉及对水资源保护的人们的态度,行为,动机和满足的审查。进行了一项调查,该调查将来自基奇纳和Waterloo,安大略省社区的公民随机样本的数据收集,以及在水需求管理研讨会上的参与者中。分析了39名公共受访者和33名专家受访者的数据。比较分析的结果表明,专家认为率结构策略比公众更有效。虽然两组均等额定教育战略明显高于其他需求管理方案,但专家们倾向于低估公众对减少信仰的全部范围。受访者的数据也经受尺寸分析,并且检查了尺寸之间的关系。结果表明,人们不是一个但几个保护相关的态度,他们报告了从保护行为中派生了一系列单独和不同的内在满足。这些内在的满足不是全球概念,而是涉及例如节俭和参与的特定涉及。这些调查结果具有实际和理论相关性。实际益处来自于设计更有效的需求管理技术的可能性。避免开发基于公众思考的偏心的水需求计划似乎是明智的。它更有效,更令人尴尬,发现在计划期间在开发方案期间发现公众和专家知识和偏好结构之间的差异,而不是在实施一个计划期间具有这些差异面。我们的理论理解可以通过调查更多的态度行为一致性或外在奖励的影响来改善为什么人们烦恼采取环境管理行为。应赋予从环境适当行为的内在满足的更多研究注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号