首页> 外文OA文献 >Protocol for a mixed-methods realist evaluation of a health service user feedback system in Bangladesh
【2h】

Protocol for a mixed-methods realist evaluation of a health service user feedback system in Bangladesh

机译:混合方法的协议现实主义评估孟加拉国的健康服务用户反馈系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Responsiveness to service users’ views is a widely-recognised objective of health systems. A key component of responsive health systems is effective interaction between users and service providers. Despite a growing literature on patient feedback from high-income settings, less is known about effectiveness of such systems in low and middle income countries. Methodology and analysis: This paper disseminates the protocol for an 18-month ‘RESPOND’ project that aims to evaluate the system of collecting and responding to user feedback in Bangladesh. This mixed-method study uses a Realist Evaluation approach to examine user feedback systems at two Upazila Health Complexes in Comilla district of Bangladesh, and comprises three steps: i) initial theory development; ii) theory validation; and iii) theory refinement and development of lessons learned. The project also utilises: i) Process evaluation to understand causal mechanisms and contexts of implementation; ii) Statistical analysis of patient feedback to clarify the nature of issues reported; iii) Social science methods to illuminate feedback processes and user and provider experiences; and iv) Health policy and systems research to clarify issues related to integration of feedback systems with quality assurance and human resource management. During data analysis, qualitative and quantitative findings will be integrated throughout to help achieve study objectives. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data will be done using a convergent mixed methods model, involving continuous triangulation of multiple datasets to facilitate greater understanding of the context of user feedback systems including the links with relevant policies, practices and programmes. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approvals were obtained from the University of Leeds and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council. All data collected for this study will be anonymised and identifying characteristics of respondents will not appear in a final manuscript or reports. The study findings will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
机译:简介:响应服务使用者的观点是卫生系统公认的目标。响应式卫生系统的关键组成部分是用户与服务提供商之间的有效交互。尽管关于来自高收入环境的患者反馈的文献越来越多,但对于这种系统在中低收入国家的有效性知之甚少。方法论和分析:本文分发了一个为期18个月的“响应”项目的协议,该项目旨在评估孟加拉国用户反馈的收集和响应系统。这项混合方法的研究使用“现实主义者”评估方法来检查孟加拉国科米拉区两个Upazila卫生院的用户反馈系统,该过程包括三个步骤:i)初步的理论发展; ii)理论验证; iii)理论的完善和经验教训的发展。该项目还利用:i)进行过程评估,以了解实施的因果机制和背景; ii)对患者反馈进行统计分析,以阐明所报告问题的性质; iii)阐明反馈过程以及用户和提供者体验的社会科学方法; iv)卫生政策和系统研究,以澄清与反馈系统与质量保证和人力资源管理相集成有关的问题。在数据分析过程中,定性和定量结果将整合在一起,以帮助实现研究目标。定性和定量数据的分析将使用收敛的混合方法模型进行,涉及对多个数据集进行连续三角剖分,以促进对用户反馈系统上下文的更好理解,包括与相关政策,实践和计划的链接。伦理和传播:伦理学许可已从利兹大学和孟加拉国医学研究理事会获得。为这项研究收集的所有数据都将被匿名化,并且在最终的手稿或报告中不会显示受访者的特征。研究结果将在科学会议上发表,并在同行评审期刊上发表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号