首页> 外文OA文献 >PIH16 ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING TREATED WITH INPATIENT OR OUTPATIENT HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION

【2h】

PIH16 ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING TREATED WITH INPATIENT OR OUTPATIENT HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION

机译：患有住院病或门诊分子切除术治疗子宫出血的妇女的PIH16经济和临床结果与子宫内膜消融

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
M. Bonafede; O. Tran; J.D. Miller; S.K. Pohlman; A. Vilalta; K.A. Troeger;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2019
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Economic and Clinical Outcomes Among Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Treated with Inpatient or Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Endometrial Ablation [J] . M.M. Bonafede, Q. Cai, J.D. Miller, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2017,第7期

机译：住院病或门诊子宫切除术治疗子宫出血的妇女的经济和临床结果与子宫内膜消融
2. Economic and Clinical Outcomes Among Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Treated with Inpatient or Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Endometrial Ablation [J] . M.M. Bonafede, Q. Cai, J.D. Miller, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2017,第7期

机译：住院病或门诊子宫切除术治疗子宫出血的妇女的经济和临床结果与子宫内膜消融
3. Economic Evaluation of Global Endometrial Ablation Versus Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives [J] . Miller Jeffrey D., Bonafede Machaon M., Cai Qian, Population health management . 2018,第APRaSUPPLa1期

机译：全球子宫内膜消融术相对于住院和门诊子宫切除术治疗异常子宫出血的经济评估：美国商业和医疗补助付款方观点
4. Evidence - Based Results of Hysterectomy and Its Alternatives: How To Avoid a Hysterectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding [C] . S. Palomba, R. Oppedisano, T. Russo, Societa? Italiana di Endoscopia Ginecologica . 2007

机译：子宫切除术的基于循证结果及其替代方案：如何避免出血术治疗子宫出血
5. A Medicare benefit expansion: Inpatient clinical and economic outcomes in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. [D] . Haley, Jane Castelli. 2011

机译：医疗保险利益扩展：帕金森氏病深部脑刺激的住院临床和经济结果。
6. Cost effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the NovaSure® system versus other global ablation modalities and hysterectomy for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding: US commercial and Medicaid payer perspectives [O] . Jeffrey D Miller, Gregory M Lenhart, Machaon M Bonafede, 2015

机译：使用NovaSure®系统进行子宫内膜切除术与其他整体切除术和子宫切除术治疗异常子宫出血的成本效益：美国商业和医疗补助付款方的观点
7. Economic Evaluation of Global Endometrial Ablation Versus Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives [O] . Jeffrey D. Miller, Machaon M. Bonafede, Qian Cai, 2018

机译：全球子宫内膜消融与关节和门诊子宫切除术治疗异常子宫出血的经济评价：美国商业和医疗报价商的观点

PIH16 ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING TREATED WITH INPATIENT OR OUTPATIENT HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅