首页> 外文OA文献 >Environmental and Economic Benefits from the Phase-out of Residential Oil Heating: A Study from the Aosta Valley Region (Italy)
【2h】

Environmental and Economic Benefits from the Phase-out of Residential Oil Heating: A Study from the Aosta Valley Region (Italy)

机译:逐步淘汰住宅油加热的环境和经济效益:奥斯塔谷地区的一项研究(意大利)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although its use is declining, oil heating is still used in areas not covered by the methane grid. Oil heating is becoming more and more expensive, requires frequent tank refill operations, and has high emissions of greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutants such as SOx. In addition, spills from oil underground storage tanks (USTs) represent a serious environmental threat to soil and groundwater quality. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis on technical alternatives to oil heating with reference to the Aosta Valley (NW Italy), where this fuel is still often used and numerous UST spills have been reported in the last 20 years. We assess operational issues, GHG and pollutant emissions, and unit costs of the heat produced for several techniques: LPG boilers, wood boilers (logs, chips, pellets) and heat pumps (air-source, geothermal closed-loop and open-loop systems). We examine the investment to implement such solutions in two typical cases, a detached house and a block of flats, deriving payback times of about 3−8 years. Wood log boilers turn out to be the most economically convenient solutions; however, heat pumps provide several benefits from the operational and environmental points of view. In addition, including solar thermal panels for domestic hot water or a photovoltaic plant would have payback times of about 6−9 years. The results highlight the economic feasibility and the multiple benefits of a rapid phase-out of oil heating in Italy.
机译:虽然其使用是下降,但油加热仍然用于未被甲烷栅格覆盖的区域。油加热变得越来越昂贵,需要频繁的坦克再填充操作,并具有高排放的温室气体(GHG)和空气污染物,如SOX。此外,来自石油地下储罐(USTS)的泄漏代表了对土壤和地下水质量的严重环境威胁。在本文中,我们对奥斯塔谷(NW意大利)提供了对油加热的技术替代品的综合分析,其中仍然经常使用这种燃料,并且在过去的20年中仍有许多溢出。我们评估运营问题,温室气体和污染物排放,以及用于多种技术的热量的单位成本:LPG锅炉,木锅炉(原木,芯片,颗粒)和热泵(空气源,地热闭环和开环系统)。我们研究投资,在两个典型的案例中实施此类解决方案,一个独立的房屋和一块公寓,获得大约3 - 8年的投资回报时间。木日志锅炉是最经济方便的解决方案;然而,热泵提供了来自操作和环境观点的几个好处。此外,包括用于国内热水或光伏厂的太阳能热面板将有大约6 - 9年的投资回报时间。结果突出了意大利迅速淘汰油加热的经济可行性和多种益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号