首页> 外文OA文献 >Surface ozone and its precursors at Summit, Greenland: comparison between observations and model simulations
【2h】

Surface ozone and its precursors at Summit, Greenland: comparison between observations and model simulations

机译:格陵兰萨米特峰的地面臭氧及其前体:观测值与模型模拟之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent studies have shown significant challenges for atmosphericmodels to simulate tropospheric ozone (O) and its precursors in theArctic. In this study, ground-based data were combined with a global 3-Dchemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) to examine the abundance and seasonalvariations of O and its precursors at Summit, Greenland(72.34° N, 38.29° W; 3212 m a.s.l.). Model simulations foratmospheric nitrogen oxides (NO), peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), ethane(CH), propane (CH), carbon monoxide (CO), and Ofor the period July 2008–June 2010 were compared with observations. The modelperformed well in simulating certain species (such as CO and CH),but some significant discrepancies were identified for other species andfurther investigated. The model generally underestimated NO and PAN (by  ∼  50 and 30 %, respectively) for March–June. Likelycontributing factors to the low bias include missing NO and PANemissions from snowpack chemistry in the model. At the same time, the modeloverestimated NO mixing ratios by more than a factor of 2 inwintertime, with episodic NO mixing ratios up to 15 times higher thanthe typical NO levels at Summit. Further investigation showed thatthese simulated episodic NO spikes were always associated withtransport events from Europe, but the exact cause remained unclear. The modelsystematically overestimated CH mixing ratios by approximately20 % relative to observations. This discrepancy can be resolved bydecreasing anthropogenic CH emissions over Asia and the US by  ∼ 20 %, from 5.4 to 4.4 Tg year. GEOS-Chem was able to reproduce theseasonal variability of O and its spring maximum. However, comparedwith observations, it underestimated surface O by approximately 13 %(6.5 ppbv) from April to July. This low bias appeared to be driven by severalfactors including missing snowpack emissions of NO and nitrous acid inthe model, the weak simulated stratosphere-to-troposphere exchange flux ofO over the summit, and the coarse model resolution.
机译:最近的研究表明,大气模型在北极模拟对流层臭氧(O)及其前体时面临着巨大挑战。在这项研究中,将地面数据与全球3-D化学品运输模型(GEOS-Chem)结合起来,研究了格陵兰萨米特(72.34°N,38.29°W; 3212 m asl)的O及其前体的丰度和季节变化。 )。将大气氮氧化物(NO),过氧乙酰硝酸盐(PAN),乙烷(CH),丙烷(C​​H),一氧化碳(CO)和Ofor 2008年7月至2010年6月的模型模拟与观测值进行了比较。该模型在模拟某些物种(例如CO和CH)方面表现良好,但是发现了其他物种的一些重大差异并进行了进一步研究。该模型通常低估了3月至6月的NO和PAN(分别为〜50和30%)。造成低偏差的可能因素包括模型中积雪化学中缺少的NO和PANemissions。同时,该模型在冬季期间高估了NO混合比,超过了2倍,而偶发性NO混合比则比Summit上的典型NO水平高出15倍。进一步的调查表明,这些模拟的突发性NO峰值总是与来自欧洲的运输事件有关,但确切原因尚不清楚。该模型相对于观测值系统地高估了CH的混合比例约20%。可以通过将亚洲和美国的人为CH排放量从5.4 Tg年降低20%到20%Tg来解决这一差异。 GEOS-Chem能够再现O的季节变化及其春季最大值。但是,与观测值相比,它从4月到7月低估了表面O约13%(6.5 ppbv)。这种低偏差似乎是由多种因素驱动的,其中包括模型中缺少NO和亚硝酸的积雪堆排放,峰顶上O的模拟平流层至对流层交换通量弱以及模型的粗略分辨率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号