首页> 外文OA文献 >Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review
【2h】

Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care and Electronic Health: Systematic Mixed Methods Review

机译:家庭儿科姑息治疗和电子健康:系统混合方法综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundChildren and families in pediatric palliative care depend on close contact with health care personnel, and electronic health (eHealth) is suggested to support care at home by facilitating their remote interactions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify and review the use of eHealth to communicate and support home-based pediatric palliative care and appraise the methodological quality of the published research. MethodsWe conducted a convergent, systematic mixed methods review and searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible papers. Studies evaluating 2-way communication technology for palliative care for children aged ≤18 years and applying quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods from 2012 to 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Quantitative and qualitative studies were equally valued during the search, screening, extraction, and analysis. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative data and analyzed using a thematic analysis. Overall, 2 independent researchers methodologically appraised all included studies. ResultsWe identified 1277 citations. Only 7 papers were eligible for review. Evaluating eHealth interventions in pediatric palliative care poses specific methodological and ethical challenges. eHealth to facilitate remote pediatric palliative care was acknowledged both as an intrusion and as a support at home. Reluctance toward eHealth was mainly identified among professionals. ConclusionsThe strengths of the conclusions are limited by the studies’ methodological challenges. Despite the limitless possibilities held by new technologies, research on eHealth in home-based pediatric palliative care is scarce. The affected children and families appeared to hold positive attitudes toward eHealth, although their views were less apparent compared with those of the professionals. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42018119051; https://tinyurl.com/rtsw5ky
机译:BackgroundChildren和家庭儿科姑息治疗取决于与医护人员密切联系,以及电子健康(电子健康)通过促进他们的远程交互建议支持护理在家。 ObjectiveThis研究的目的是确定和审查使用电子卫生保健的沟通和支持以家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗和评价发表的研究的方法学质量。 MethodsWe进行了融合,系统的混合方法,审查和搜查医学文献分析和检索系统在线(MEDLINE),医学文摘,PsycINFO,Cochrane图书馆,累积索引护理及专职医疗文学(CINAHL),科学网,和Scopus为符合条件的文件。研究评估双向通信技术,姑息治疗的适龄儿童≤18岁运用定量,定性的,或混合的方法2012年至2018年有资格列入。定量和定性研究的检索,筛选,提取和分析过程中得到同等重视。定量数据转换成定性数据和使用专题分析分析。总体而言,2个独立的研究方法论评估所有纳入研究。 ResultsWe确定1277个引文。只有7篇论文进行资格复审。在儿科姑息治疗评估电子健康干预提出具体的方法和伦理挑战。电子健康便于远距离的儿科姑息治疗承认既是入侵和在家里的支持。对电子健康磁阻主要是鉴定专家之一。结论ConclusionsThe优势通过研究方法论的挑战限制。尽管新技术持有的无限可能,关于电子卫生保健研究以家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗是稀缺的。受影响的儿童和家庭似乎对持有电子健康积极的态度,虽然他们的看法与专业人士相比不太明显。试用RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42018119051; https://tinyurl.com/rtsw5ky

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号