首页> 外文OA文献 >Observing atmospheric formaldehyde (HCHO) from space: validation andintercomparison of six retrievals from four satellites (OMI, GOME2A, GOME2B,OMPS) with SEAC4RS aircraft observations over the southeast US
【2h】

Observing atmospheric formaldehyde (HCHO) from space: validation andintercomparison of six retrievals from four satellites (OMI, GOME2A, GOME2B,OMPS) with SEAC4RS aircraft observations over the southeast US

机译:从太空观察大气甲醛(HCHO):验证和从四颗卫星(OMI,GOME2A,GOME2B,OMPS)与SEAC4RS飞机在美国东南部的观测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Formaldehyde (HCHO) column data from satellites are widely used as a proxyfor emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), but validation of thedata has been extremely limited. Here we use highly accurate HCHO aircraftobservations from the NASA SEACRS (Studies of Emissions, AtmosphericComposition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys) campaign overthe southeast US in August–September 2013 to validate and intercompare sixretrievals of HCHO columns from four different satellite instruments (OMI,GOME2A, GOME2B and OMPS; for clarification of these and other abbreviationsused in the paper, please refer to Appendix A) and three different researchgroups. The GEOS-Chem chemical transport model is used as a commonintercomparison platform. All retrievals feature a HCHO maximum over Arkansasand Louisiana, consistent with the aircraft observations and reflecting highemissions of biogenic isoprene. The retrievals are also interconsistent intheir spatial variability over the southeast US (  =  0.4–0.8 on a0.5°  ×  0.5°  grid) and in their day-to-dayvariability (  =  0.5–0.8). However, all retrievals are biased low inthe mean by 20–51 %, which would lead to corresponding bias in estimatesof isoprene emissions from the satellite data. The smallest bias is forOMI-BIRA, which has high corrected slant columns relative to the otherretrievals and low scattering weights in its air mass factor (AMF)calculation. OMI-BIRA has systematic error in its assumed vertical HCHO shapeprofiles for the AMF calculation, and correcting this would eliminate itsbias relative to the SEACRS data. Our results support the use ofsatellite HCHO data as a quantitative proxy for isoprene emission aftercorrection of the low mean bias. There is no evident pattern in the bias,suggesting that a uniform correction factor may be applied to the data untilbetter understanding is achieved.
机译:来自卫星的甲醛(HCHO)色谱柱数据被广泛用作挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放的代理,但是对数据的验证受到极大限制。在这里,我们使用2013年8月至9月在美国东南部开展的NASA SEACRS(排放,大气成分,云与气候耦合研究,通过区域调查研究)活动获得的高精度HCHO飞机观测数据,来验证和比较来自四种不同卫星仪器(OMI ,GOME2A,GOME2B和OMPS;要澄清本文中使用的这些缩写和其他缩写,请参阅附录A)和三个不同的研究组。 GEOS-Chem化学迁移模型用作常见的相互比较平台。所有取回物的特征是在阿肯色州和路易斯安那州上空的HCHO最大值,这与飞机的观测结果一致,并反映出生物异戊二烯的高排放。在美国东南部(在0.5°××0.5°网格上,= 0.4–0.8)和它们的日常变化(= –0.5–0.8),它们的空间变异也是一致的。但是,所有取值均偏低20-51%,这将导致卫星数据中异戊二烯排放量的估计值出现相应偏倚。 OMI-BIRA的最小偏差是,相对于其他检索而言,OMI-BIRA具有较高的校正后倾斜柱,并且在其空气质量因子(AMF)计算中具有较低的散射权重。 OMI-BIRA在用于AMF计算的假定垂直HCHO形状轮廓中存在系统误差,并且对其进行校正将消除其相对于SEACRS数据的偏差。我们的研究结果支持使用卫星HCHO数据作为低均值偏差校正后异戊二烯排放的定量替代指标。偏差中没有明显的规律,这表明可以对数据应用统一的校正因子,直到获得更好的理解为止。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号