首页> 外文OA文献 >Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits
【2h】

Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty or Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Intravertebral Cleft Complicated by Neurological Deficits

机译:后固定结合椎体牙柱或椎体柱切除治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折与神经系统缺陷复杂化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relative benefits of posterior fixation combined with vertebroplasty (PFVP) or vertebral column resection (PVCR) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) complicated by neurological deficits. Methods. From June 2010 to January 2015, 45 consecutive patients suffering OVCFs with IVC and spinal cord injuries were treated with PFVP or PVCR in our department. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), local kyphotic angle (LKA), and neurologic function were evaluated and compared, and the operative duration, blood loss, and complications were also recorded. Results. They all achieved excellent pain relief, vertebral height recovery, and kyphosis correction one month after surgery, and no significant differences existed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the 1-month postoperative and final follow-up VAS, AVH, and LKA values in the PVCR group (P>0.05), while AVH and LKA worsened in the PFVP group at the final follow-up (P<0.05). Similarly, the initial improvements in VAS scores decreased over time (P0.05). The blood loss and operative duration were significantly lower in the PFVP group than those in the PVCR group (P<0.05). Conclusion. Compared with PVCR, PFVP had equivalent short-term clinical outcomes with less blood loss and operative duration which can be very beneficial for treating elderly patients with extreme comorbidities in this condition. However, based on the long-term efficacy of pain relief, vertebral height maintenance, and deformity correction, PVCR is a more reasonable choice.
机译:目的。目前研究的目的是评估后固定与椎骨成形术(PFVP)或椎体柱切除(PVCR)的相对益处与骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)与骨髓裂缝(IVC)复杂化的神经系统缺陷。方法。从2010年6月到2015年1月,45名患有IVC和脊髓损伤的OVCF的45名患者用PFVP或PVCR治疗了我们的部门。评估和比较视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,前椎体高度(AVH),后椎体高度(LKA),局部黑色角度(LKA)和神经系统功能,以及手术持续时间,失血和并发症记录。结果。他们都在手术后1个月实现了优异的疼痛缓解,椎体高度恢复和脊柱型校正,两组之间存在显着差异。在PVCR组的1个月术后和最终后续VAS,AVH和LKA值之间没有观察到显着差异(P> 0.05),而最终随访的PFVP组中的AVH和LKA在PFVP组中脱落(P. <0.05)。类似地,VAS分数的初始改进随时间(p0.05)降低。 PFVP组中的血液损失和手术持续时间显着低于PVCR组中的持续时间(P <0.05)。结论。与PVCR相比,PFVP具有相同的短期临床结果,具有较少的血液损失和手术持续时间,这对于在这种情况下治疗老年患者的患者非常有益。但是,根据疼痛缓解,椎体高度维护和畸形矫正的长期疗效,PVCR是一种更合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号