首页> 外文OA文献 >A better understanding of cloud optical thickness derived from the passive sensors MODIS/AQUA and POLDER/PARASOL in the A-Train constellation
【2h】

A better understanding of cloud optical thickness derived from the passive sensors MODIS/AQUA and POLDER/PARASOL in the A-Train constellation

机译:更好地理解来自A火车星座中无源传感器MODIS / AQUA和POLDER / PARASOL的云光学厚度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cloud optical thickness (COT) is one of the most important parameter for thecharacterization of cloud in the Earth radiative budget. Its retrievalstrongly depends on instrument characteristics and on many cloud andenvironment factors. Using coincident observations from POLDER/PARASOL andMODIS/AQUA in the A-Train constellation, geographical distributions andseasonal changes of COT are presented, in good agreement with general cloudclimatology characteristics. Retrieval uncertainties mainly associated tosensor spatial resolution, cloud inhomogeneity and microphysical assumptionsare discussed.Comparisons of COT derived from POLDER and MODIS illustrate that as theprimary factor, the sensor spatial resolution impacts COT retrievals andstatistics through both cloud detection and sub-pixel cloud inhomogeneitysensitivity.The uncertainties associated to cloud microphysics assumptions, namely cloudphase, particle size and shape, also impact significantly COT retrievals.For clouds with unambiguous cloud phase, strong correlations exist betweenthe two COTs, with MODIS values comparable to POLDER ones for liquid cloudsand MODIS values larger than POLDER ones for ice clouds. The largedifferences observed in ice phase cases are due to the use of differentmicrophysical models in the two retrieval schemes. In cases when the twosensors disagree on cloud phase decision, COT retrieved assuming liquidphase is systematically larger.The angular biases related to specific observation geometries are alsoquantified and discussed in particular based on POLDER observations. Thoseexhibit a clear increase of COT with decreasing sun elevation and a decreaseof COT in forward scattering directions due to sub-pixel inhomogeneities andshadowing effects, this especially for lower sun. It also demonstratesunrealistic COT variations in the cloudbow and backward directions due toinappropriate cloud optical properties representation and an importantincrease of COT in the sun-glint directions in case of broken cloud.
机译:云光学厚度(COT)是地球辐射预算中云表征的最重要参数之一。它的检索强烈取决于仪器的特性以及许多云和环境因素。利用POLDER / PARASOL和MODIS / AQUA在A火车星座的同时观测资料,得出了COT的地理分布和季节变化,与一般的云气候特征十分吻合。讨论了主要与传感器空间分辨率,云非均匀性和微物理假设有关的检索不确定性。POLDER和MODIS得出的COT的比较表明,作为主要因素,传感器空间分辨率会通过云检测和亚像素云非均匀性敏感性影响COT检索和统计数据。与云微物理学假设相关的云相,粒径和形状也对COT的检索产生重大影响。对于云相明确的云,两个COT之间存在很强的相关性,液态云的MODIS值与POLDER相近,而MODIS值大于POLDER冰云。在冰期情况下观察到的较大差异是由于在两种取回方案中使用了不同的微物理模型。如果两个传感器在云相决策方面存在分歧,则假定液相色谱系统地取回COT较大。还对与特定观测几何形状有关的角度偏差进行了量化和讨论,尤其是根据POLDER观测结果进行了讨论。由于亚像素的不均匀性和阴影效应(特别是对于较低的太阳光),这些表现出随着太阳高度的降低而COT明显增加,而正向散射方向的COT则明显降低。它还显示了由于云光学特性表示不当以及在云层破裂的情况下,太阳向眩光方向上COT的显着增加,导致云弓和后向的COT变化是现实的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号