首页> 外文OA文献 >Quantification of an atmospheric nucleation and growth process as a single source of aerosol particles in a city
【2h】

Quantification of an atmospheric nucleation and growth process as a single source of aerosol particles in a city

机译:量化大气成核和生长过程作为城市中气溶胶颗粒的单一来源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Effects of a new aerosol particle formation (NPF) and particle diametergrowth process as a single source of atmospheric particle numberconcentrations were evaluated and quantified on the basis of experimentaldata sets obtained from particle number size distribution measurements in thecity centre and near-city background of Budapest for 5 years.Nucleation strength factors for a nucleation day (NSF) and for ageneral day (NSF) were derived separately for seasons and fullyears. The former characteristic represents the concentration increment ofultrafine (UF) particles specifically on nucleation days with respect toaccumulation-mode (regional background) concentrations (particles withequivalent diameters of 100–1000 nm; ) due solely to thenucleation process. The latter factor expresses the contribution ofnucleation to particle numbers on general days; thus, it represents a longertime interval such as season or year. The nucleation source had the largesteffect on the concentrations around noon and early afternoon, as expected.During this time interval, it became the major source of particles in thenear-city background. Nucleation increased the daily mean concentrations onnucleation days by mean factors of 2.3 and 1.58 in the near-city backgroundand city centre, respectively. Its effect was largest in winter, which wasexplained by the substantially lower levels on nucleation daysthan those on non-nucleation days. On an annual timescale, 37 % of the UFparticles were generated by nucleation in the near-city background, while NPFproduced 13 % of UF particles in the city centre. The differences amongthe annual mean values, and among the corresponding seasonal mean values,were likely caused by the variability in controlling factors from year toyear. The values obtained represent the lower limits of the contributions.The shares determined imply that NPF is a non-negligible or substantialsource of particles in near-city background environments and even in citycentres, where the vehicular road emissions usually prevail. Atmosphericresidence time of nucleation-mode particles was assessed by a decay curveanalysis, and a mean of 02:30 was obtained. The present study suggests thatthe health-related consequences of the atmospheric NPF and growth process incities should also be considered in addition to its urban climateimplications.
机译:根据布达佩斯市中心和附近城市背景的粒径分布分布测量获得的实验数据集,评估并量化了新的气溶胶颗粒形成(NPF)和粒径增长过程作为大气颗粒物浓度的单一来源的效果。 5年。分别针对季节和全年得出成核日(NSF)和普通日(NSF)的成核强度因子。前一个特性代表特别是在成核日相对于累积模式(区域背景)浓度(等效直径为100-1000 nm的粒子)产生的超细(UF)粒子的浓度增加,这完全是由于成核过程造成的。后一个因素表示成核对一般天数对颗粒数量的贡献;因此,它表示较长的时间间隔,例如季节或年份。如预期的那样,成核源对中午和下午午后浓度的影响最大。在此时间间隔内,成核源成为后来城市背景下主要的颗粒来源。在近城市背景和市中心,成核作用使成核日的日平均浓度分别增加2.3和1.58。其影响在冬季最大,这可以通过成核日的水平明显低于非成核日的水平来解释。在每年的时间尺度上,近城市背景下有37%的超滤颗粒是通过成核产生的,而NPF在市中心产生了13%的超滤颗粒。年平均值之间以及相应的季节平均值之间的差异很可能是由控制因素每年之间的变化引起的。获得的值代表缴费额的下限。所确定的份额表明,NPF在城市背景环境中,甚至在通常以机动车道路排放为主要排放量的城市中心,都是不可忽视的或大量的颗粒物来源。通过衰减曲线分析评估成核模式颗粒的大气停留时间,并得出平均值为02:30。本研究表明,除了对城市气候的影响外,还应考虑大气NPF和生长过程不健康对健康的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号