首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis
【2h】

Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

机译:植入溶液植入术后光学质量与波前引导激光发生在原位角膜瘤之后的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To compare the optical quality after implantation of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WG-LASIK).METHODS: The study included 40 eyes of 22 patients with myopia who accepted ICL implantation and 40 eyes of 20 patients with myopia who received WG-LASIK. Before surgery and three months after surgery, the objective scattering index (OSI), the values of modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, and the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) values (OVs) were accessed. The higher order aberrations (HOAs) data including coma, trefoil, spherical, 2nd astigmatism and tetrafoil were also obtained. For patients with pupil size <6 mm, HOAs data were analyzed for 4 mm-pupil diameter. For patients with pupil size ≥6 mm, HOAs data were calculated for 6 mm-pupil diameter. Visual acuity, refraction, pupil size and intraocular pressures were also recorded.RESULTS: In both ICL and WG-LASIK group, significant improvements in visual acuities were found postoperatively, with a significant reduction in spherical equivalent (P< 0.001). After the ICL implantation, the OSI decreased slightly from 2.34±1.92 to 2.24±1.18 with no statistical significance (P=0.62). While in WG-LASIK group, the OSI significantly increased from 0.68±0.43 preoperatively to 0.91±0.53 postoperatively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, P=0.000). None of the mean MTF cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, OVs showed statistically significant changes in both ICL and WG-LASIK groups. In the ICL group, there were no statistical differences in the total HOAs for either 4 mm-pupil or 6 mm-pupil. In the WG-LASIK group, the HOA parameters increased significantly at 4 mm-pupil. The total ocular HOAs, coma, spherical and 2nd astigmatism were 0.12±0.06, 0.06±0.03, 0.00±0.03, 0.02±0.01, respectively. After the operation, these values were increased into 0.16±0.07, 0.08±0.05, -0.04±0.04, 0.03±0.01 respectively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, all P<0.05). At 6 mm-pupil, the induction of total HOAs was not statistically significant in the WG-LASIK group.CONCLUSION: ICL implantation has a less disturbance to optical quality than WG-LASIK. The OQAS is a valuable complementary measurement to the wavefront aberrometers in evaluating the optical quality.
机译:目的:将光学质量与原位角膜瘤(WG-LASIK)植入植入植入杆状透镜(ICL)和波前引导激光后进行比较。方法:该研究包括42名肌肌瘤42名患者,他接受了ICL植入和20名患有WG-LASIK的近视患者的40只眼睛。在手术前和手术后三个月,目的散射指数(OSI),调制传递函数(MTF)截止频率,斯特勒比比率和光学质量分析系统(OQAS)值(OVS)。还获得了包括昏迷,三叶草,球形,第二散差和四滤网的高阶像差(HOAS)数据。对于瞳孔尺寸<6mm的患者,对HOAS数据进行分析4mm-瞳孔直径。对于瞳孔尺寸≥6mm的患者,计算HOAS数据6 mm-瞳孔直径。还记录了视力,折射,瞳孔尺寸和眼内压力。结果:在ICL和WG-LASIK组中,术后发现了视力缩小的显着改善,球形当量显着降低(P <0.001)。在ICL植入后,OSI略微从2.34±1.92减少到2.24±1.18,没有统计学意义(P = 0.62)。在WG-LASIK组中,OSI术后术前从0.91±0.43的0.91±0.43增加到0.91±0.53(Wilcoxon签名等级测试,P = 0.000)。均未平均MTF截止频率,STREH1比,OV显示ICL和WG-LASIK组的统计显着变化。在ICL组中,4 mm-瞳孔或6毫米瞳孔的总HOA中没有统计差异。在WG-LASIK组中,HOA参数在4毫米瞳孔中显着增加。镜头全部HOAS,昏迷,球形和第二散距分别为0.12±0.06,0.06±0.03,000±0.03,0.02±0.01。操作后,这些值分别升高到0.16±0.07,0.04±0.05,0.04±0.04,0.03±0.01,0.03±0.01,所有P <0.05)。在6mm-瞳孔中,在WG-LASIK组中,HOAs的诱导在统计学中没有统计学意义。结论:ICL植入对光学质量的干扰较小而不是WG-LASIK。 OQAS是对波前像比器评估光学质量的宝贵互补测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号