首页> 外文OA文献 >Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of growing rabbits housed in cages or open-air park
【2h】

Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of growing rabbits housed in cages or open-air park

机译:关在笼子或露天公园中的成年兔子的生长性能,car体特性和肉质

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study was carried out to investigate the effects of two housing systems on the growthperformance, carcass traits, and meat quality of growing rabbits during the terminalfattening period. The rabbits were lodged in conventional cages between 35 and 59 daysof age (growing period). At this age, they were moved into two different housing systemsuntil they were 87 days of age (fattening period). During the fattening period, 48 rabbitswere housed in 12 wire cages (0.5×0.6×0.35 m) and 48 rabbits were housed in one open-airpasture pen (20×9 m). At 87 days, 12 rabbits per treatment were slaughtered and the carcasscharacteristics and meat quality were evaluated. During the fattening period, the rabbitsreared in cages had significantly higher live weights (3 062 vs. 2 705 g), weight gains (45.9 vs.34.2 g·d) and feed intakes (163.4 vs. 110.2 g·d) than those reared in pens. The rabbits in theopen-air group had a lower percentage of dissectible fat (1.35 vs. 4.19 %), a higher proportionof hind part (34.9 vs. 33.1 %), and less hind leg muscle (79.3 vs. 81.9 %) than caged rabbits.The of the rabbits in the open-air group had a higher cooking loss (3.64vs. 3.02 %), Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (4.26 vs. 3.29 kg·cm), and myoglobin concentration(0.41 vs. 0.32 mg·g) than caged rabbits. The housing system had no effect on the dressingout percentage, viscera proportion, and ultimate pH. Open-air housing system reduces thegrowth of rabbits and the fat content of carcasses and increases the redness colour of meat.
机译:这项研究旨在调查两种生猪系统对生长期的成年兔子生长性能,car体性状和肉品质的影响。将兔子放在35至59日龄(成长期)的常规笼子里。在这个年龄,他们被转移到两个不同的住房系统中,直到他们的年龄为87天(肥胖期)。在育肥期间,将48只兔子关在12个铁丝网笼中(0.5×0.6×0.35 m),将48只兔子关在一只露天牧草笼中(20×9 m)。在第87天,每处理12只兔子被屠宰,并评估其cas体特征和肉质。在育肥期间,饲养在笼中的兔子的活重(3 062比2 705 g),增重(45.9 vs. 34.2 g·d)和摄食量(163.4 vs. 110.2 g·d)明显高于饲养的兔子。在笔上。与笼养兔子相比,露天组的可分解脂肪百分比较低(1.35比4.19%),后肢比例较高(34.9比33.1%),后腿肌肉较少(79.3比81.9%)。露天组的兔子的烹饪损失较高(3.64比3.02%),华纳-布拉茨勒剪切力(4.26 vs. 3.29 kg·cm)和肌红蛋白浓度较高(0.41 vs. 0.32 mg·g) )比笼养兔子。外壳系统对换药率,内脏比例和最终pH值没有影响。露天饲养系统减少了兔子的成长和car体的脂肪含量,并增加了肉的发红颜色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号