首页> 外文OA文献 >Antioxidants as Adjuvants in Periodontitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Antioxidants as Adjuvants in Periodontitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:抗氧化剂作为牙周炎治疗中的辅助剂:系统审查和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of antioxidants as an adjuvant in periodontitis treatment. The following databases were consulted: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Lilacs, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. Based on the PICO strategy, the inclusion criteria comprised interventional studies including periodontitis patients (participants) treated with conventional therapy and antioxidants (intervention) compared to patients treated only with conventional therapy (control) where the periodontal response (outcome) was evaluated. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB tool (for randomized studies) and ROBINS-I tool (for nonrandomized studies). Quantitative data were analyzed in five random effects meta-analyses considering the following periodontal parameters: clinical attachment loss (CAL), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD). After all, the level of certainty was measured with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Among the 1884 studies identified, only 15 interventional studies were according to the eligibility criteria and they were included in our review. From them, 4 articles presented a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference for CAL (SMD 0.29 (0.04, 0.55), p=0.03, I2=13%), PI (SMD 0.41 (0.18, 0.64), p=0.0005, I2=47%), and BOP (SMD 0.55 (0.27, 0.83), p=0.0001, I2=0%). The GRADE tool showed a moderate to high certainty in the quality of evidence depending on the clinical parameter and antioxidants used. These results suggest that the use of antioxidants is an adjunct approach to nonsurgical periodontal therapy which may be helpful in controlling the periodontal status.
机译:该系统审查与META分析旨在评估抗氧化剂作为牙周炎治疗中佐剂的影响。咨询了以下数据库:PubMed,Scopus,Science,Cochrane,Lilacs,OpenGrey和Google Scholar。基于微微策略,包含常规治疗和抗氧化剂(干预)治疗的介入性研究包括常规治疗(干预)的介入研究,所述介入性研究包括常规治疗(对照)的常规治疗(对照)评估牙周反应(结果)。使用Cochrane Rob工具(用于随机研究)和Robins-I工具(对于非扫描研究)来评估偏差的风险。考虑以下牙周参数:临床附着损失(CAL),牙菌斑(PI),牙龈指数(GI),在探测(BOP)上出血,探测(BOP)和探测深度(PD)中出血和探测深度(PD)中的定量数据分析。毕竟,通过建议,评估,开发和评估(等级)工具的评分来衡量确定性水平。在确定的1884项研究中,只有15项介入研究是根据资格标准的根据资格标准,他们被列入我们的审核。从他们那里,4篇文章呈现出高偏见的风险。 Meta分析显示CAL的统计学显着差异(SMD 0.29(0.04,0.55),P = 0.03,I2 = 13%),PI(SMD 0.41(0.18,0.64),P = 0.0005,I2 = 47%),和BOP(SMD 0.55(0.27,0.83),P = 0.0001,I2 = 0%)。根据所用临床参数和抗氧化剂,级别工具在证据质量方面表现出中度至高的确定性。这些结果表明,使用抗氧化剂是非牙髓牙周治疗的辅助方法,这可能有助于控制牙周地位。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号