首页> 外文OA文献 >Polyonymity in Monasticism. Review of the book: Uspenskij, B. A., Uspenskij, F. B. (2017). Inocheskiie imena na Rusi Monastic Names in Medieval Russia. Moscow; St Petersburg: Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; Nestor History. 344 p.
【2h】

Polyonymity in Monasticism. Review of the book: Uspenskij, B. A., Uspenskij, F. B. (2017). Inocheskiie imena na Rusi Monastic Names in Medieval Russia. Moscow; St Petersburg: Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; Nestor History. 344 p.

机译:修主中的重聚。审查这本书:Uspenskij,B. A.,&Uspenskij,F. B.(2017)。 Inocheskiie imena na Rusi 中世纪俄罗斯的修道院名称。莫斯科;圣彼得堡:俄罗斯科学院斯拉夫研究所;特纳历史。 344 p。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The reviewed book focuses on a particular category of Russian anthroponymy — the names of monastics of all degrees, that is, rassophore, little schema, and great schema. As is known, the tonsure rite in the Orthodox Church regularly involves a change in the name of a person who “takes on an angelic image,” that is, becomes a monk. Questions relating to the systemic nature of this renaming, the circumstances thereof, and the principles of choosing a new name are the subject of special attention of the reviewed publication. On the whole, the monograph is an outcome of a long-term and fundamental collaborative research on Old Russian anthroponymy performed by B. A. Uspenskij and F. B. Uspenskij (father and son) and A. F. Litvina (the spouse of the latter), but here the chronological framework is extended up to modern times. The line between the Old Russian and the later tradition is usually marked by the second South Slavic influence and the reforms of Patriarch Nikon, which in many respects were also a product of the Greek and Western Russian traditions. Among the main strengths of the reviewed work are a broad historical perspective — from the times of Kievan Rus’ to the present, deep immersion into theological (liturgical and legal ecclesiastical) issues, the abundance of factual and illustrative material (chronicles, church documents, hagiography, epistolary sources) added by contemporary works and personal observations of the authors. At the same time, the review notes that some conclusions are of a purely hypothetical type, due to the scarcity of historical sources and factual data. However, the authors are well aware of it, which affects the overall “tone” of the book as they outline the problems, both solved and unresolved, encouraging the readers to enter the scientific discussion.
机译:该综述的书籍着重于特定类别的俄罗斯人类 - 各种程度的墨水名称,即Rassophore,Little Schema和Great Schema。众所周知,正统教会中的成果仪式经常涉及“承担天使形象”的人名称的变化,即成为一个僧侣。与这种重命名的系统性质有关的问题,其情况以及选择新名称的原则是审查的出版物的特别关注的主题。总的来说,专着是由Ba Uspenskij和FB Uspenskij(父亲)和AF Litvina(后者的配偶)进行的旧俄罗斯人类的长期和基本协作研究的结果,但在这里是时间框架延伸到现代。旧俄罗斯和后期传统之间的界限通常是由第二南斯拉夫的影响以及族长尼康的改革,这在许多方面也是希腊和西方俄罗斯传统的产物。在审查工作的主要优势中是一种广泛的历史观点 - 从基辅罗斯的时代到现在,深深浸入神学(宗教和法律教会)问题,丰富的事实和说明材料(编年史,教会文件,由当代作品添加的文化,夹杂地区来源和提交人的个人观察。与此同时,审查指出,由于历史来源和事实数据的稀缺,一些结论是一种纯粹假设的类型。然而,作者非常了解它,这会影响本书的整体“音调”,因为它们概述了解决问题,既有问题和未解决的问题,鼓励读者进入科学讨论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sergey O. Goryaev;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 rus
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 22:00:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号