首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of one-year results of photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab or aflibercept for treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
【2h】

Comparison of one-year results of photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab or aflibercept for treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

机译:比较光动力治疗与ranibizumab或Aflibercept治疗脊髓瘤脉络膜病变的一年结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeTo compare the 1-year visual outcomes and anatomical responses of patients who received photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections with those of patients who received PDT combined with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections for treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).MethodsWe retrospectively studied all treatment-naïve patients with PCV who received PDT combined with either IVR or IVA. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), the number of additional injections, and the presence of polypoidal lesions, as indicated by indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), during 1 year were evaluated.ResultsForty-four eyes were assessed at the 1-year follow-up examination. Of these, 23 were treated with PDT combined with IVR (PDT/IVR group), and 21 were treated with PDT combined with IVA (PDT/IVA group). In both groups, BCVA was shown to be significantly improved 1 year after the initial treatment. CMT and CCT were also significantly decreased after 1 year. There were no significant differences in the changes in BCVA or CMT between the two groups. However, the change in CCT in the PDT/IVA group was significantly larger than that of the PDT/IVR group (P < 0.001). The mean number of additional injections was 0.78 ± 0.21 in the PDT/IVR group and 0.57 ± 0.21 in the PDT/IVA group with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.45). The polyp regression rate at 12 months was 78.2% in the PDT/IVR group and 78.9% in the PDT/IVA group with no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsPDT combined with either IVR or IVA was well tolerated and appeared to improve both vision and anatomy in patients with PCV. PDT/IVA may have a more pronounced effect on macular choroidal thickness at 1-year follow-up.
机译:Puposeto比较接受光动力治疗(PDT)的患者的1年视觉结果和解剖学反应与接受PDT联合术治疗脊髓灰质脉络膜病变的术治疗脊髓灰质炎(IVA)注射的患者(IVR)注射患者(PCV ).Methodswe回顾性地研究了所有治疗的PCV患者,接受PDT与IVR或IVA联合。如吲哚菁绿色血管造影(ICGA)所示,最佳校正的视力(BCVA),中央黄斑厚度(CCT),中央脉络膜厚度(CCT),额外注射次数和息肉病变的存在评估。在1年的后续检查中评估了4只眼睛。其中,用PDT与IVR(PDT / IVR组)进行处理23,用PDT与IVA(PDT / IVA组)处理21例。在这两个群体中,BCVA显示在初始治疗后1年明显改善。 CMT和CCT在1年后也显着下降。两组之间BCVA或CMT的变化没有显着差异。然而,PDT / IVA组中CCT的变化显着大于PDT / IVR组(P <0.001)。 PDT / IVR组的额外注射的平均数量为0.78±0.21,在PDT / IVA组中0.57±0.21,两组之间没有显着差异(P = 0.45)。 PDT / IVR组12个月的息肉回归率为78.2%,PDT / IVA组中的78.9%在两组之间没有显着差异。结合IVR或IVA的CONCLUSIONSPDT良好耐受,似乎改善了视力和PCV患者的解剖学。 PDT / IVA可能对黄斑脉络膜厚度有更明显的影响,在1年的随访时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号