首页> 外文OA文献 >Review of the Monograph T.F. Khaidarov “Age of ‘Black Death’ in Golden Horde and Adjacent Regions” Kazan: Marjani Institute of History of Academy of Sciences, 2018. 304 P.
【2h】

Review of the Monograph T.F. Khaidarov “Age of ‘Black Death’ in Golden Horde and Adjacent Regions” Kazan: Marjani Institute of History of Academy of Sciences, 2018. 304 P.

机译:审查专着T.F.金库伊和邻近地区的哈德拉夫“黑人死亡年龄”“喀山:马詹尼科学院科学院,2018。304 P.

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The author examines the monographic work of T.F. Khaidarov, devoted to the study of the second plague pandemic in the Golden Horde and neighboring territories, which was published in 2018. Researchers have already studied some aspects of the course of the Black Death in Eastern Europe. Before the publication of the monograph, T.F. Khaidarov had published several articles devoted to this problem. Despite this, the monograph is the first experience of a comprehensive study of the manifestations of the second plague pandemic in all their diversity in Eastern Europe. The objectives set in the book required the synthesis of various natural sciences (biology, climatology, medicine) and social (history, historical source study, social anthropology) disciplines. In the monograph phenomena of different scale are investigated. On the one hand, the epidemics in Eastern Europe were considered in the context of the worldwide course of the pandemic. On the other hand, from the researcher’s view did not escape the local phenomena: the specific dating of a particular outbreak of the epidemic, the problem of the perception of the disease by society, the features of its description, etc. In the review, an assessment is given to this "total" study of the pandemic. The advantage of this approach is that it overcomes the boundaries between different scientific disciplines, allows us to fill the knowledge that is fragmentary in each separate science. The drawback of this approach is that it leads to the absolutization of the plague factor in history. The study of Black Death becomes the main link in the whole multidisciplinary research, turns into a kind of paradigm. Sometimes this leads to incorrect reading of historical sources and scientific works. Despite the revealed shortcomings, it should be recognized that the monograph of T.F. Khaidarov is a serious step forward in the study of the problem at the present stage of the development of science.
机译:作者审查了T.F的一张单纯性工作。 Khaidarov致力于在2018年出版的金落和邻国地区的第二次瘟疫大流行研究。研究人员已经研究了东欧黑色死亡过程的某些方面。在公开专着之前,T.F. Khaidarov发表了一些致力于这个问题的文章。尽管如此,专着是全面研究在东欧所有多样性中第二瘟疫大流行病的全面研究的第一次经验。本书中设立的目标需要综合各种自然科学(生物学,气候学,医学)和社会(历史,历史源书,社会人类学)学科。在调查不同规模的专着现象中。一方面,在大流行过程中,东欧的流行病被认为是在全世界的大流行过程中。另一方面,从研究人员的看法没有逃脱当地现象:特定爆发的特定约会疫情,社会对疾病的看法的问题,其描述的特征在审查中,对大流行的“总”研究提供了评估。这种方法的优势在于它克服了不同科学学科之间的界限,使我们能够填补每个单独科学中零碎的知识。这种方法的缺点是它导致历史中瘟疫因子的绝对化。黑死的研究成为整个多学科研究中的主要联系,变成了一种范式。有时这导致历史来源和科学作品的读数不正确。尽管揭示了缺点,但应该认识到,专着T.F. Khaidarov在科学发展发展阶段研究了对问题的严重迈出。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daniil V. Puzanov;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 rus
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号