首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods for swine barns
【2h】

Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods for swine barns

机译:猪谷仓生物对比较的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two bioaerosol sampling methods (Andersen sampler and filtration sampler) were compared. The two samplers were used to assess the bioaerosol loads in two swinefinishing barns. They were similar in termsof the species of microorganisms sampled.The persistent strains of microorganismswere various species of the following genera:Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Bacillus,Listeria, Enterococcus, Nocardia, Lactobacillus, and Penicillium. However, theuse of Andersen sampler resulted in significantly higher bioaerosol concentrations than the filtration sampler. Thus, it appears that filtration sampling can be used for a qualitative survey of bioaerosols in swine barns while the Andersen sampler is suitable for both quantitative and qualitative assessments.
机译:比较了两种生物气溶胶采样方法(安德森采样器和过滤采样器)。使用两个采样器评估两个养猪场中的生物气溶胶负荷。就所采样的微生物种类而言,它们是相似的。微生物的持久性菌株是以下属的各种种类:葡萄球菌,假单胞菌,芽孢杆菌,李斯特菌,肠球菌,诺卡氏菌,乳杆菌和青霉菌。但是,使用Andersen采样器会导致生物气溶胶浓度明显高于过滤采样器。因此,似乎过滤采样可以用于猪舍中生物气溶胶的定性调查,而安德森采样器既适合定量评估也适合定性评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号