首页> 外文OA文献 >Field-crop-sprayer potential drift measured using test bench: Effects of boom height and nozzle type
【2h】

Field-crop-sprayer potential drift measured using test bench: Effects of boom height and nozzle type

机译:使用测试台测量的现场 - 作物喷雾器电位漂移:悬臂高度和喷嘴类型的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Because of variations in environmental conditions, spray-drift field measurements following ISO 22866:2005 involve complicated and time-consuming experiments often with low repeatability. Therefore, simple, repeatable, and precise alternative drift assessment methods that are complementary to the official standards are required. One of the alternatives is the use of a drift test bench for field crop sprayers. Previous studies have demonstrated that the drift test bench can be considered an adequate complement to existing standard protocols for field drift measurements. In this study, in order to further improve the methodology and to evaluate the possibility of classifying different field-crop-sprayer settings according to drift risk using a test bench, a series of tests were performed in a test hall. A conventional mounted Delvano HD3 crop sprayer (Delvano, Kuurne, Belgium) equipped with an 800-l spray tank and a 15-m-wide stainless steel spray boom was used. Eight different sprayer setups were tested, involving three nozzle types (TeeJet XR 110 04, Agrotop TDXL 110 04 and Micron Micromax 3) and three boom heights (0.30, 0.50, and 0.70 m). For the drift classification, the reference sprayer drift behaviour was defined as that obtained using conventional flat fan TeeJet XR 110 04 nozzles operated at 0.30 MPa and at a boom height of 0.50 m. The different sprayer setups were successfully assigned to different drift reduction classes, and the results underlined the effects of nozzle type and boom height on the potential drift. The feasibility of the test-bench methodology for classifying field-crop-sprayer drift according to ISO 22369-1:2006 was demonstrated.
机译:由于环境条件的变化,ISO 22866:2005之后的喷雾漂移场测量涉及经常具有低重复性的复杂和耗时的实验。因此,需要简单,可重复和精确的替代漂移评估方法,这些方法是与官方标准互补的。其中一个替代方案是使用漂移测试台用于田间作物喷雾器。以前的研究表明,漂移测试台可以被认为是现有的现有标准协议的适当补充,用于现场漂移测量。在这项研究中,为了进一步改善方法,并根据使用测试台的漂移风险评估根据漂移风险进行分类的可能性,在测试厅中进行了一系列测试。使用传统的安装Delvano HD3裁剪喷雾器(Delvano,Kuurne,比利时),配备了800-L喷雾罐和15米宽的不锈钢喷雾臂。测试八种不同的喷雾器设置,涉及三种喷嘴类型(Teejet XR 110 04,Agrootop TDX1110 04和Micron Micromax 3)和三个动臂高度(0.30,0.50和0.70米)。对于漂移分类,参考喷雾器漂移行为定义为使用以0.30MPa和0.50μm的动臂高度操作的传统扁平风扇Teejet XR 110 04喷嘴所获得的。不同的喷雾器设置成功分配给不同的漂移减少等级,结果强调了喷嘴型和动臂高度对电位漂移的影响。证明了根据ISO 22369-1:2006对田间作物喷雾器漂移进行分类的试验台方法的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号