首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of global geomagnetic field models and evaluation using marine datasets in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and western Mediterranean Sea
【2h】

Comparison of global geomagnetic field models and evaluation using marine datasets in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and western Mediterranean Sea

机译:全球地磁场模型与北东部大西洋海洋和西部地中海的海洋数据集的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Many models describing the Earth’s magnetic field exist and are maintained by international research organizations. However, no clear general overview of the cross-compared quality of these models is available. An evaluation of the internal component and of the anomaly field as estimated by a selection of nine geomagnetic models with global coverage is presented here. Anomaly field models are also compared with an external, independently processed marine dataset extracted from Shom’s (the French Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service) geophysical database. The comparative study shows that internal geomagnetic fields computed outside the provisional domain, up to degrees 12 or 13 of spherical harmonics (SH), can be considered as equivalent. Relative amplitude differences with the World Magnetic Model 2015 (WMM2015) and the 12th generation of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF-12) taken as references are lower than 10 nT. For an extent reduced to the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and western Mediterranean Sea, anomaly field models up to SH degree 720 and the 3rd version of the Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid (EMAG2v3) at the equivalent 0.5° resolution are the closest models to the filtered marine data. However, they are significant spatial discrepancies and standard deviations of differences between models and data are about 65 nT. The 3-arc-minute World Digital Magnetic Anomaly Map (WDMAM) best reflects the unfiltered marine data, but with significant standard deviations of about 70 nT. Results demonstrate that any model can be used with insignificant errors to compute raw anomalies from total field measurements by removing the internal component of the Earth’s magnetic field. In addition, they suggest that the priority should be given to WDMAM for levelling and evaluating marine datasets and for computing enhanced high-resolution regional magnetic maps.
机译:摘要描述地球磁场的许多模型存在并由国际研究组织维护。但是,没有明确的概述这些模型的交叉质量。这里介绍了通过选择九种地磁模型估计的内部组分和异常区域的评估。异常场模型也与从Shom(法国水文和海洋)地球物理数据库中提取的外部,独立处理的海洋数据集进行了比较。比较研究表明,在临时域之外计算的内部地质地质磁场,高达球形谐波(SH)的度数12或13,可以视为等同物。与作为参考文献的世界磁模型2015(WMM2015)(WMM2015)和第12代作为参考的国际地磁参考字段(IGRF-12)的相对幅度差异低于10NT。在某种程度上还原到东北大西洋和西部地中海,异常场模型上至SH度720和第3版的地球磁性异常网格(Emag2v3)的相当于0.5°分辨率是过滤的最接近的模型海洋数据。然而,它们是显着的空间差异,模型和数据之间的差异的标准偏差约为65.5nt。 3弧分钟世界数字磁性异常地图(WDMAM)最能反映未过滤的海洋数据,但具有大约70 nt的重要标准偏差。结果表明,通过去除地球磁场的内部分量,可以使用任何模型来计算来自总场测量的原始异常。此外,他们表明,应优先考虑WDMAM,用于调平和评估海洋数据集,并计算增强的高分辨率区域磁性地图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号