首页> 外文OA文献 >Wage insurance within German firms: do institutions matter?
【2h】

Wage insurance within German firms: do institutions matter?

机译:德国公司的工资保险:做机构吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using a large linked employer-employee data set, this paper studies the extent to which employers insure workers against transitory and permanent firm-level shocks. Particular emphasis is given to the question of whether the amount of wage insurance depends on the nature of industrial relations. Adopting the identification strategy proposed by Guiso et al. (2005), it is shown that wage insurance is particularly apparent for individuals subject to collective wage agreements. While collective contracts alone are sufficient to fully insure workers against transitory shocks in small plants, they provide only partial insurance in medium-sized and large plants. At large employers, the joint existence of collective contracts and works councils helps to provide full insurance against transitory shocks, but provides only partial insurance against permanent shocks. This finding is consistent with the amount of insurance against permanent shocks being constrained by the possibility of considerable job losses and bankruptcy.
机译:本文使用大型的雇主-雇员数据集,研究了雇主在多大程度上确保工人免受暂时性和永久性企业级冲击的影响。特别强调工资保险额是否取决于劳资关系的性质。采用Guiso等人提出的识别策略。 (2005年)表明,工资保险对于受集体工资协议约束的个人尤为明显。虽然仅集体合同足以充分保证工人免受小型工厂的短暂冲击,但集体合同仅提供中型和大型工厂的部分保险。在大型雇主中,集体合同和劳资委员会的共同存在有助于为抵御短暂冲击提供全面的保险,而对于永久性冲击仅提供部分保险。这一发现与永久性冲击的保险额受到大量失业和破产的可能性的约束是一致的。

著录项

  • 作者

    N. Guertzgen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号