首页> 外文OA文献 >Cached Files Updating Revisited: The Distribution of Popularity-Weighted Average File Age

【2h】

Cached Files Updating Revisited: The Distribution of Popularity-Weighted Average File Age

机译：缓存文件更新重新访问：流行权加权平均文件年龄的分布

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Jixiang Zhang;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2020
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Optimal Caching Designs for Perfect, Imperfect, and Unknown File Popularity Distributions in Large-Scale Multi-Tier Wireless Networks [J] . Ye Chencheng, Cui Ying, Yang Yang, IEEE Transactions on Communications . 2019,第9期

机译：大型多层无线网络中完美，不完美和未知文件流行度分布的最佳缓存设计
2. Grande Cache Coal Corporation Files Independent Technical Report For The No. 12S B2 Mine Area And Update Production Guidance [J] . The TEX Report . 2004,第8609期

机译：Grande Cache Coal Corporation提交12S B2矿区的独立技术报告并更新生产指南
3. Centralized File-Cached Storage Protects Against Disaster [J] . John Henze Computer Technology Review . 2003,第9期

机译：集中式文件缓存存储可防止灾难
4. Age of Information Aware Cache Updating with File- and Age-Dependent Update Durations [C] . Haoyue Tang, Philippe Ciblat, Jintao Wang, International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks . 2020

机译：信息感知缓存的年龄随着文件和年龄的更新持续时间而更新
5. Who's afraid of file format obsolescence? Evaluating file format endangerment levels and factors for the creation of a file format endangerment index. [D] . Ryan, Heather. 2014

机译：谁怕文件格式过时？评估文件格式危害等级和创建文件格式危害索引的因素。
6. Malware Detection of Hangul Word Processor Files Using Spatial Pyramid Average Pooling [O] . Young-Seob Jeong, Jiyoung Woo, SangMin Lee, 2020

机译：使用空间金字塔平均池的恶意软件检测Hangul Word处理器文件
7. Figure 6: (A) Tree resulted the standard MP analysis of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) constructed using the modified summary of Lehtonen et al. (2011) (see “Materials and Methods” for the details) and a posteriori rooted relatively Papio (length = 12,092, CI = 0.7877, RI = 0.5597); 34,022 characters are constant, and the number of the parsimony-informative characters is equal to 4,311. MP BS values are provided below branches. The only characters with non-ambiguous value of the outgroup (Papio) have been saved within concatenated alignment; (B) the average consensus tree of the score 0.00084 resulted the analysis of the Hennigian forest of the 5,507 trees derived from the binary representation of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) (see “Materials and Methods” for the details); Papio is assumed to be the best all-plesiomorphic group. “Additional…” FORESTER’s output tree file (see “Materials and Methods” for the details) selected for future analyses; (C) the average consensus tree of the score 0.00090 resulted the analysis of the Hennigian forest of the 5,339 trees derived from the modified binary representation of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) (see 6.I. and “Materials and Methods” for the details), but with all 168 trees, which contain the clade (Homo plus Pan) have been removed from the input forest. “Additional…” FORESTER’s output tree file (see “Materials and Methods”) selected for future analyses. [O] . -1

机译：图6：（A）树导致的标准MP分析的98-基因座的类人猿（人科，灵长类动物，哺乳动物），使用莱赫托宁等人的修改的摘要构成的超级矩阵。（2011）（参见细节“材料和方法”）以及相对植根狒狒后验概率（长度= 12092，CI = 0.7877，RI = 0.5597）; 34022个字符是恒定的，并且简约信息的字符数等于4311。下面提供分支MP BS值。与外类群（狒狒）的非模糊值的唯一的字符已被保存的级联对准内; （B）的得分0.00084的平均一致树导致从巨猿（原始人类，灵长类动物，哺乳动物）的98座超级矩阵的二进制表示获得的5507棵的Hennigian森林的分析（见“材料和方法”为细节）;狒狒被认为是最好的全祖征群。 “其他...” FORESTER的输出树文件（请参阅详细信息“材料和方法”），用于进一步的分析; （C）的分数0.00090的平均一致树导致从98个位点的类人猿（人科，灵长类动物，哺乳动物）的超级矩阵（见6.I的改性二进制表示导出的5339种树木的Hennigian森林的分析以及“材料和方法”的详细说明），但所有168棵，其中包含的分支（智人加PAN）已经从输入林中删除。 “其他...” FORESTER的输出树文件（参见“材料和方法”），用于进一步的分析。

Cached Files Updating Revisited: The Distribution of Popularity-Weighted Average File Age

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅