首页> 外文OA文献 >Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods
【2h】

Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods

机译:烧伤或埋葬?最终废物处理方法的社会成本比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper uses private and environmental cost data for the Netherlands to evaluate the social cost of two final waste disposal methods, landfilling versus incineration using waste-to-energy (WTE) plants. The data only provide some support for the widespread policy preference for incineration over landfilling if the analysis is restricted to environmental costs alone. Private costs, however, are so much higher for incineration, that landfilling is the social cost minimizing option at the margin even in a densely populated country such as the Netherlands. Implications for waste policy are discussed as well. Proper treatment of and energy recovery from landfills seem to be the most important targets for waste policy. WTE plants are a very expensive way to save on climate change emissions.
机译:本文使用荷兰的私人和环境成本数据来评估两种最终废物处理方法的社会成本,这两种方法是垃圾填埋与使用垃圾发电工厂的焚化。如果仅将分析仅限于环境成本,则数据仅对焚烧而不是垃圾填埋的广泛政策偏好提供了支持。但是,焚化的私人成本要高得多,即使在人口稠密的国家(例如荷兰),垃圾填埋也是将社会成本降至最低的选择。还讨论了废物政策的含义。正确处理垃圾掩埋场并从中回收能量似乎是废物政策的最重要目标。 WTE工厂是节省气候变化排放的一种非常昂贵的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号