首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of a wood sampler for macroinvertebrate bioassessment of non-wadeable streams in the southeastern coastal plain
【2h】

Comparison of a wood sampler for macroinvertebrate bioassessment of non-wadeable streams in the southeastern coastal plain

机译:木材采样器对东南沿海平原非可铺展溪流的木制采样器的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aquatic macroinvertebrates are often the subject of biomonitoring efforts because they are ubiquitous in most systems and are known to be suitable indicators of water quality. The vast majority of biomonitoring efforts that use macroinvertebrates are tailored towards small, wadeable streams, whereas methods for sampling macroinvertebrates in non-wadeable streams (i.e., large rivers) are often less available. We compared the use of a wood sampler to collect aquatic macroinvertebrates with two more commonly used samplers (Hester-Dendy and leaf packs) to assess its suitability for sampling non-wadeable systems in the Georgia Coastal Plain. All three types of samplers were deployed at three sites on each of the Savannah and Ogeechee River for approximately 30 days during the fall of 2014. Mean, standard deviation, and variance components were examined from 53 common bioassessment metrics and 2 multi-metric indices to assess for potential differences in colonizing macroinvertebrates between the samplers. Only 9 of the metrics examined scored significantly different between sampling devices, however, assemblages colonizing the three sampling devices differed (PERMANOVA; F14,37 =1.6078, P = 0.001). Results suggest assemblage differences were primarily driven by the proportions of taxa collected by each device, rather than by different taxa colonizing devices altogether. Estimates of variance components attributed a large percentage (i.e., >20%) of the variability encountered to differences between sites, rather than devices. Our study shows that wood samplers are comparable to other devices commonly used for collecting macroinvertebrates from non-wadeable streams in the Georgia Coastal Plain. Furthermore, wood samplers can provide a suitable alternative for bioassessment, although some differences in the proportions of taxa collected with alternative devices should be expected. Determining the precision and overall efficiency of alternative sampling devices is an important step towards developing standard operating procedures for the bioassessment of large coastal plain rivers.
机译:水生形型大型型常备是生物监测努力的主题,因为它们在大多数系统中普遍存在,并且已知是水质的合适指标。使用Macroinvertebrate的绝大多数生物监测努力朝着小型,可挥之平的流定制,而在不可呈现的流中采样非弱型流(即,大河流)的方法往往不太可用。我们比较了使用木材采样器与两种常用采样器(海斯特 - Dendy和Leaf Pack)收集水生形近似vertebrete,以评估其在格鲁吉亚沿海平原中采样不可弯曲的系统的适用性。在2014年秋季,所有三种类型的采样器部署在每个大草原和Ogeechee河上的三个地点。平均值,标准偏差和方差分量从53个常见的生物和分量标准和2个多度量指数中检查评估采样器之间殖民殖民的潜在差异。在采样装置之间检测到的度量标准中只有9个测量,然而,殖民区集殖民化三种采样装置不同(alplenova; f14,37 = 1.6078,p = 0.001)。结果表明组合差异主要是由每个设备收集的分类量的比例,而不是完全由不同的分类器殖民设备。方差分量的估计归因于站点之间遇到的差异的大百分比(即> 20%)而不是设备之间的差异。我们的研究表明,木材采样器与其他用于从佐治亚州沿海平原中的非可挥之障的溪流收集大型狂犬的其他设备相当。此外,木材采样器可以为生物分囊提供合适的替代品,尽管应预期采用替代设备收集的分类量的比例的一些差异。确定替代采样装置的精度和整体效率是迈向大型沿海普通河流的生物分囊标准操作程序的重要一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号