首页> 外文OA文献 >Employment of disabled people in Norway and the United Kingdom. Comparing two welfare regimes and why this is difficult
【2h】

Employment of disabled people in Norway and the United Kingdom. Comparing two welfare regimes and why this is difficult

机译:在挪威和英国的残疾人士就业。比较两个福利制度以及为什么这很困难

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this article is twofold. First, we explore the differences in employment of disabled people between Norway and the United Kingdom, and to what degree differences in employment rates are due to variation in definition and measures of disability. Secondly, we discuss the significance of the two countries belonging to different welfare regimes when it comes to disabled people’s relation to the labour market. Most of the data on disabled people’s labour market participation stems from the Labour Force Surveys in the two countries, and the 2005 figures are used as a basis. The results indicate that the employment rate of disabled people is higher in the UK than in Norway. The article argues that this is first and foremost due to different ways of defining and measuring disability. The article illustrates why comparing two welfare states can be difficult. Are different welfare regimes of any significance for disabled people’s engagement with the labour market? The results indicate that the use of different welfare means within the two regimes may lead to similar results.
机译:本文的目标是双重。首先,我们探讨了挪威和英国之间残疾人的就业差异,以及就业率的程度差异是由于残疾的定义和措施的变化。其次,我们讨论了两国属于不同福利制度的两个国家,当涉及到残疾人与劳动力市场的关系时。关于残疾人劳动力市场参与的大多数数据源于两国的劳动力调查,2005年数字被用作基础。结果表明,英国残疾人的就业率比挪威更高。本文认为,由于不同的定义和测量残疾的方式,这是首先和最重要的。本文说明了为什么比较两个福利国家可能困难。是对残疾人与劳动力市场的任何意义的不同福利制度吗?结果表明,在两个制度范围内使用不同的福利手段可能导致类似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号