首页> 外文OA文献 >New Zealand radiation therapists’ perceptions of peer group supervision as a tool to reduce burnout symptoms in the clinical setting
【2h】

New Zealand radiation therapists’ perceptions of peer group supervision as a tool to reduce burnout symptoms in the clinical setting

机译:新西兰辐射治疗师对同龄群监管的看法作为减少临床环境中倦怠症状的工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Introduction Research indicates that radiation therapists (RTs) are at risk of burnout and that there is a lack of evidence on effective coping strategies for managing work‐related stressors within this workforce. Peer group supervision (PGS) is a useful tool in assisting staff to manage stress in the clinical setting, improve reflective practice and provide support. The aim of this research was to investigate New Zealand (NZ) RTs’ perceptions of participating in PGS. Methods In‐service training on PGS was offered to all RT centres in NZ, and five of the nine centres agreed to partake in PGS. Participants anonymously completed the same online questionnaire, six months apart. The questionnaire consisted of the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire (CSEQ), an open‐ended question and demographics. The CSEQ asks participants to indicate their agreement with 14 statements related to Purpose, Process and Impact of PGS. Results Overall, 71 and 48 participants completed the first and second surveys, respectively. In contrast to previous studies, this study found that confidence in practice, team support and group safety were valued by participants. This was supported by the qualitative data that revealed four themes: supportive groups, time out to reflect, organisational barriers and group process issues. RTs with one to five years’ experience were more likely to structure their meetings, understand the purpose of the meetings and had clearer expectations of the group process. Conclusions PGS may address burnout for RTs with one to five years’ experience. This group of RTs feel patient‐related matters can be discussed openly during PGS, and PGS appears to be helping to improve their practice and reduce stress. More experienced RTs appear to be using the groups as a ‘professional support group’, rather than ‘peer supervision’, as a strategy for managing organisational stressors associated with burnout.
机译:摘要介绍研究表明,辐射治疗师(RTS)有倦怠的风险,缺乏关于在本员工中管理与工作相关的压力园的有效应对策略的证据。同行团体监督(PGS)是协助员工在临床环境中管理压力,改善反思实践并提供支持的有用工具。本研究的目的是调查新西兰(NZ)RTS参与PGS的看法。方法对PGS的服务在役培训提供给NZ的所有RT中心,其中5个九个中心同意参加PGS。与会者匿名完成了相同的在线问卷,六个月分开。调查问卷由临床监督评估问卷(CSEQ)组成,是一个开放的问题和人口统计。 CSEQ要求参与者与第14个与PGS的目的,过程和影响有关的陈述表示同意。结果总体而言,71和48名参与者分别完成了第一和第二调查。与之前的研究相比,这项研究发现,在实践中的信心,团队支持和团体安全受到参与者的重视。这是通过揭示四个主题的定性数据的支持:支持群体,超时,反映,组织障碍和小组流程问题。 RTS与一到五年的经验更有可能构建他们的会议,了解会议的目的,并更清楚地对小组进程的预期。结论PGS可以通过一到五年的经验来解决RTS的倦怠。这组RTS感到患者相关的事项可以在PGS期间公开讨论,PGS似乎有助于改善他们的实践和减轻压力。更经验丰富的RTS似乎是使用本组作为“专业支持集团”,而不是“同行监督”,作为管理与倦怠相关的组织压力源的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号