The question, which launched our study, concerns the problem of the legal possibilities carried out in order to protect canonically the state of the consecrated life even though assumed temporary. Firstly, the Author tries to focus on the meaning of the canonical state and canonical status of the consecrated persons. The aim is to point out that it is not appropriate to simply consider condicio as the state sic et simpliciter in the meaning of the legislation of the 1983 Code.In a second moment, the Author analyses the hypothesis relates to lose the proper canonical status, especially this one assumed ad tempus. The question the Author tries to answer concerns legal possibilities and appropriates manners in order to protect the single consecrated religious.Finally, the Author presents the main thesis of this paper, relates to the pre -establishment of the proof. In this perspective, it is very convenient for both the religious Authority and an individual religious to document the proper acts/activities even though, in case of the legal Superiors, deprived of binding force.
展开▼
机译：推出我们研究的问题涉及法律可能性的问题为了保护规范的生活状态，即使是奉献的生活假设临时。首先，作者试图关注规范的含义国家和规范地位 奉献者。目的是指出它不是适合简单地考虑cond 作为国家SiC et Simpliciter. 在含义的意思1983年守则的立法。在第二时刻，作者分析了假设涉及失去适当的典范地位，特别是这一假设广告节目。作者试图的问题为了回答担心法律可能性和拨款方式以保护单一奉献的宗教。最后，作者介绍了本文的主要论文，涉及预先建立证明。在这种观点中，这对宗教权威和宗教权威非常方便一个个人宗教，以记录适当的行为/活动，即使是法律上司，剥夺了约束力。
展开▼
