首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen mental health problems among school-age children in Mongolia
【2h】

Validation of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen mental health problems among school-age children in Mongolia

机译:验证父母版本的优势和困难问卷(SDQ)在蒙古中学生儿童中筛选心理健康问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Child and adolescent mental health problems are urgent health issues in low- and middle-income countries. To promote child and adolescent mental health services, simple validated screening tools are helpful. In Mongolia, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), an internationally used child and adolescent mental health screening tool for children aged 4–17, was translated but not yet validated. To use the questionnaire appropriately, validation is necessary. Methods Children at 4th year at elementary school (community sample) and children visited psychiatric outpatient service (clinical sample) were recruited and their parental version of the SDQ was compared. The discriminating ability of the parental version of the SDQ was examined using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis on the SDQ total difficulties score. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as a measure. Cut-off score was determined by normative banding that categorizes children with the highest 10% score range as abnormal and the second highest 10% as borderline following the original method; this cut-off score was compared with the cut-off score candidates with good balance between sensitivity and specificity using ROC analysis. Results We included 2301 children in the community sample, and 429 children in the clinical sample. Mean age was 9.7 years (SD 0.4, range 8.3–12.0) among the community sample and 10.4 years (SD 3.8, range 4.0–17.8) among the clinical sample. The mean total difficulties score was 12.9 (SD 4.8) among the community sample and 20.4 (SD 6.2) among the clinical sample. A total of 88.8% of the community sample and 98.8% of the clinical sample answered the SDQ. Using ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.82 (95% confident interval 0.80–0.85), which meant moderate discriminating ability. Using normative banding, the borderline cut-off score was 16/17 and abnormal cut-off score was 19/20. For cut-off scores of 16/17 and 19/20, sensitivity was 71.9 and 53.8% and specificity was 78.5 and 90.5%, respectively. The cut-off score candidates by ROC analysis were 16/17 and 17/18. Conclusions The parental version of the SDQ had moderate discriminating ability among Mongolian school-age children. For the screening of mental health problems among community children, cut-off score of 16/17 is recommended.
机译:摘要背景儿童和青少年的心理健康问题在低收入和中等收入国家的紧迫的健康问题。为促进儿童和青少年心理健康服务,简单有效的筛选工具是有用的。在蒙古,长处和困难问卷(SDQ),一种国际上使用的儿童和青少年的心理健康筛查工具,4-17岁的儿童,被翻译,但尚未生效。要适当地使用问卷调查,验证是必要的。方法在4年孩子们在小学(社区样本)和孩子们参观精神科门诊(临床样品)招募和他们的SDQ父母的版本进行比较。的SDQ的亲本的版本识别能力,使用接收者操作特性(ROC)分析在总SDQ困难得分检查。 ROC曲线(AUC)下的面积被用作测量值。截止得分是由规范绑扎确定分类儿童具有最高10%分数范围为异常和第二最高10%如下原始方法边界线;这个截止评分与使用ROC分析的灵敏度和特异性之间良好的平衡截止高分考生比较。结果共纳入2301名儿童社区样本中,和429名患儿的临床样本。平均年龄为社区样本中9.7年(SD 0.4,范围8.3-12.0)和10.4年的临床样本中(SD 3.8,范围4.0-17.8)。平均总得分的困难是12.9(SD 4.8)社区样本中20.4临床样本中(SD 6.2)。共有的社区样本的88.8%和临床样本的98.8%的人回答的SDQ。利用ROC分析,所述AUC为0.82(95%置信区间0.80-0.85),这意味着适度分辨力。使用规范绑扎,边界截止得分为16/17和异常截止得分为19/20。对于16/17 19/20和截止分数,灵敏度为71.9和53.8%,特异性为78.5分别和90.5%。通过ROC分析截止高分考生是16/17和17/18。结论SDQ的父母的版本有蒙古适龄儿童中度分辨力。为社区儿童心理健康问题,筛选,推荐截止16/17的比分。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号