首页> 外文OA文献 >Intravitreal Aflibercept injection with Panretinal photocoagulation versus early Vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage: randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Intravitreal Aflibercept injection with Panretinal photocoagulation versus early Vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage: randomized clinical trial

机译:玻璃体外型AfliBercept注射用Panretinal光凝与早期玻璃体切除术进行糖尿病玻璃体出血:随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background To compare efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injection with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus early vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Methods Prospective, randomized study that included 34 eyes with diabetic VH. They were divided into two groups, Group Ι (17 eyes) received three successive IVA injections followed by PRP and group ΙΙ (17 eyes) for whom early vitrectomy was done. Follow up was carried out after one, two, three, six and nine months. The primary outcome measure was change in the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after nine months, secondary outcome measures were mean duration of clearance of VH and rate of recurrent hemorrhage with any additional treatment in both groups. Complications were reported. Results There was no statistically significant difference regarding initial demographic criteria between both groups. The mean final log MAR BCVA was statistically better than the initial BCVA in both groups (0.51 ± 0.20, 1.17 ± 0.48 for group I and 0.48 ± 0.18, 1.44 ± 0.44 for group II, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the mean final Log Mar BCVA (0.51 ± 0.20 for group I, 0.48 ± 0.18 for group II, p ≥ 0.05), the mean duration of clearance of VH was 7.8 ± 1.8 weeks, 5 days for group I and II respectively. PRP was completely done for all eyes in group I after three months. The difference in the recurrence rate between group I (29.4%) and group II (11.8%) was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Vitrectomy was done for three eyes (17.6%) due to recurrent non-resolving VH in group I. late recurrent VH occurred in two eyes (11.8%) in group II, IVA was given with complete clearance of the hemorrhage. No vision threatening complications were reported in both groups. Conclusion Both intravitreal injection of aflibercept followed by PRP and early vitrectomy are effective and safe modalities for treatment of diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Early vitrectomy leads to faster vision gain with less incidence of recurrence than intravitreal injection. Trial registration Randomized clinical trial under the number of NCT04153253 on November 6, 2019 “Retrospectively registered”.
机译:抽象背景为了比较功效和玻璃体内阿柏西普(IVA)注射光凝(PRP)对早期玻璃体切除术糖尿病玻璃体出血(VH)的安全性。方法前瞻性,随机对照研究,其中包括34只眼糖尿病VH。他们被分为两组,组Ι(17眼)三个连续IVA注射之后PRP和组ΙΙ(17眼),对他们来说,早期玻璃体切除术已完成。随访时间是一,二,三,六至九个月之后进行。前九个月主要转归指标是平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化,次要终点指标为VH的清除和再出血率两组任何额外治疗的平均持续时间。报道并发症。结果差异无统计学关于这两个群体之间的初始人口标准显著差异。平均最终日志MAR BCVA统计学优于两组初始BCVA(0.51±0.20,1.17±0.48的I类和0.48±0.18,1.44±0.44第II组,P <0.001)。有关于所述平均最终登录三月BCVA两组之间没有统计学显著差异(0.51±0.20对组I,0.48±0.18第II组,第≥0.05),VH的间隙的平均持续时间为7.8±1.8周,5天分别为I和II组。 PRP完全对眼前的一切I组三个月后完成。在组I(29.4%)和组II(11.8%)之间的复发率差异有统计学显著(P <0.05)。玻璃体切割术是为三只眼(17.6%),由于复发性非解决组一晚VH复发VH发生在第二组的两个眼睛(11.8%)完成,IVA与出血完全清除给出。无视力威胁并发症为这两个群体。结论两种阿普西柏的玻璃体内注射之后PRP和早期玻璃体切除术是治疗糖尿病玻璃体出血的有效和安全的方式。早期玻璃体切除术导致更快的视觉增益复发比玻璃体内注射的发生率较低。试验注册随机下NCT04153253数量临床试验于2019年11月6日“回顾性注册”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号