首页> 外文OA文献 >Bedside analysis of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in the emergency room and intensive care unit – the GlycoNurse study
【2h】

Bedside analysis of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in the emergency room and intensive care unit – the GlycoNurse study

机译:急诊室和重症监护室舌下微血管糖糖尿病床头旁分析 - 甘露甘露研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Deterioration of the endothelial glycocalyx (eGC), a protective carbohydrate-rich layer lining the luminal surface of the endothelium, plays a key role in vascular barrier dysfunction and eventually organ-failure in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis. Early detection of glycocalyx damage could thus become an important goal in critical care. This study was designed to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of quantitative, real-time glycocalyx measurements performed at bedside in the emergency room (ER) and intensive care unit (ICU). Methods The observational study included 70 patients admitted to the ER or ICU of a university hospital. A physician and the nurse in charge of the patient performed sublingual microcirculatory measurements using sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging. A novel data acquisition and analysis software (GlycoCheck™) was used to analyze the perfused boundary region (PBR), an inverse parameter of endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in vessels with diameters of between 5 and 25 μm. Results The method showed a good intra-observer reproducibility. Specifically, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis showed an excellent reproducibility between the physician’s measurements (0.77 [CI 95%: 0.52–0.89]). The bias between the two PBRs was − 0.077 ± 0.24 μm. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the PBR values obtained by the nurses when compared to those reported by the physician (regarded as the “gold standard” measurement). Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis showed excellent reproducibility between the nurses’ and physician’s PBRs (0.75 [95% CI: 0.52–0.87]). The mean difference between the two PBRs (i.e., the bias) was 0.007 ± 0.25 μm. The nurses’ PBR assessment had a 90% sensitivity (95% CI: 60–99%) and 90% specificity (95% CI: 80–93%) to identify a severely impaired glycocalyx. Conclusion Glycocalyx dimensions can be measured at patients’ bedside precisely by non-invasive assessment of the PBR. This assessment could become part of standard monitoring and contribute to clinical decision-making and resuscitation protocols in clinical trials and daily practice.
机译:内皮糖萼(EGC)的抽象的背景恶化,保护富含碳水化合物的层衬在内皮的腔表面,在血管屏障功能障碍和在全身炎症反应综合征和脓毒病最终器官衰竭中起关键作用。因此,糖萼损伤的早期检测可能成为重症监护的重要目标。这项研究的目的是确定在急诊室(ER)和重症监护病房(ICU)在床边进行定量,实时测量糖萼的可行性和可重复性。方法观察性研究纳入70例患者考上了大学医院的急诊室或重症监护室。医师和负责患者的护士进行使用侧流暗场(SDF)成像舌下微循环的测量。一种新颖的数据采集和分析软件(GlycoCheck™)用于分析灌注边界区域(PBR),在血管直径5到25微米之间的内皮糖尺寸的倒数的参数。结果该方法表现出了良好的观察者内可重复性。具体而言,组内相关系数分析显示医生的测量值之间的优异的再现性(0.77 [95%CI:0.52-0.89])。两个PBRS之间的偏压为 - 0.077±0.24微米。此外,相比于那些由医师(视为“金标准”测量)报告时有在由护士获得的PBR值没有显著差异。组内相关系数分析表明护士和医师的PBRS之间优异的再现性(0.75 [95%CI:0.52-0.87])。两个PBRS(即偏压)之间的平均差异为0.007±0.25微米。护士PBR评估了90%的灵敏度(95%CI:60-99%)和90%的特异性(95%CI:80-93%),以识别一个严重受损糖萼。结论糖萼尺寸可以在患者的床边精确的在PBR的非侵入性的评估来测量。这项评估可能成为标准的监测一部分,并在临床试验和日常实践有助于临床决策和复苏协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号