首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial
【2h】

The impact of financial incentives on participants’ food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial

机译:金融激励对基于超市随机对照试验的参与者食品采购模式的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background The impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Methods Participants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher’s exact and χ2 tests assessed differences among groups in the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression assessed differences among groups in the change in proportionate FV purchasing over time. Results Post-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05). Conclusions Participants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions. Trial registration The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901 ).
机译:摘要背景基于超市营养促进干预的影响可能会参加,如果他们转向食品比例从购买自己平时商店远被高估。这项研究量化无论谁收到的超市健康饮食为生活水果和蔬菜(FV)的价格折扣参与者(架子)的随机对照试验(RCT)在干预期间转移了他们的FV采购到研究超市。方法与会者642位女性随机分配到)技能建设1(N = 160),2)降价(N = 161),3)组合的技能建设和降价(N = 160),或4)控制( N = 161)基团。参与者自我报告的FV比例在学习超市购买的基线,3位和6个月后介入。在FV比例组间Fisher精确和χ2检验评估差异研究超市购买的每个时间点。多项Logistic回归评估在一段时间内适度FV采购的变化组间差异。结果干预后,与会的49%,在学习超市购买的FV的≥50%。与所有其他组,该降价组为大约两倍(RRR:1.8-2.2),以在研究超市增加FV的比例购买从基线到干预后(P <0.05)。谁在FV收到降价结论与会者大约两倍,可能在干预期间,从其他商店的FV采购转移到学习超市。除非食品采购数据可用于所有来源,在采购模式的变化差可以使它难以辨别营养干预措施的真正影响。试验注册货架试验与当前对照试验注册ISRCTN39432901,2010年6月注册30,回顾性注册(http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901)注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号