首页> 外文OA文献 >Socioeconomic status and time in glucose target range in people with type 2 diabetes: a baseline analysis of the GP-OSMOTIC study
【2h】

Socioeconomic status and time in glucose target range in people with type 2 diabetes: a baseline analysis of the GP-OSMOTIC study

机译:2型糖尿病患者中葡萄糖靶标度的社会经济地位和时间:GP-Osmotic研究的基线分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Optimal glycaemia, reflected by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, is key in reducing type 2 diabetes (T2D) complications. However, most people with T2D have suboptimal recall and understanding of HbA1c. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) measures glucose levels every 5 to 15-min over days and may be more readily understood. Given that T2D is more common in lower socioeconomic settings, we aim to study relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and percentage time in glucose target range (TIR) which is a key metric calculated from CGM. Methods Analysis of baseline data from the General Practice Optimising Structured MOnitoring To Improve Clinical outcomes (GP-OSMOTIC) randomised controlled trial (October 2016 – November 2017) of 300 people with T2D from 25 Victorian General Practices. FreeStyle Libre Pro® sensor patch was used for this study. SES was defined by the Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) and educational attainment. Univariable and multivariable mixed-effects linear regression analyses controlling for age, BMI, diet, exercise and study arm were performed. Results One hundred and sixty-seven (60.1%) participants were male, the mean (SD) participant age was 61.0 (9.7) years, and the mean (SD) duration of CGM use was 12.3 (2.5) days. The 10th IRSD decile (least disadvantaged) was associated with a 15% higher TIR vs. the 1st decile (most disadvantaged) (95% CI 5, 25; p = 0.003) and a 0.6% lower HbA1c (95% CI 0.1, 1; p = 0.03). There was no evidence of an association between educational attainment and TIR/HbA1c. Conclusion Higher SES measured at an area level is associated with better achievement of glycaemic target using complementary measures of HbA1c and TIR in the GP-OSMOTIC cohort. Given that TIR may be more easily used in patient education and self-management support compared to HbA1c values, the social gradient identified in TIR provides an opportunity for clinicians and policy makers to address health inequities in T2D. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Trial ACTRN12616001372471, prospective, Date registered 4/10/2016.
机译:摘要背景,由糖化血红蛋白(HBA1C)水平反射的最佳糖血症是减少2型糖尿病(T2D)并发症的关键。然而,大多数有T2D的人都有次优召回和对HBA1c的理解。连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)在几天内每5至15分钟测量每5至15分钟的葡萄糖水平,并且可能更容易理解。鉴于T2D在较低的社会经济环境中更为常见,我们的目标是在血糖目标范围(TIR)中的社会经济地位(SES)和百分比时间之间的关系,这是由CGM计算的键度量。方法分析一般实践的基线数据,优化结构化监测,改善临床结果(GP-Osmotic)随机对照试验(2016年10月 - 2017年10月)来自25名维多利亚时代的一般惯例的T2D。 Freestyle LibrePro®传感器补丁用于本研究。 SE由相对社会经济劣势(IRSD)和教育程度的指数定义。进行了单位,BMI,饮食,运动和学习臂的无变量和多变量的混合效应线性回归分析。结果一百六十七(60.1%)参与者是男性,平均值(SD)参与者年龄为61.0(9.7)岁,平均值(SD)使用的持续时间为12.3(2.5)天。第10 IRDS Decile(最不弱势群)与15%较高的TIR与第1次(最弱势)(95%CI 5,25; P = 0.003)和0.6%下的HBA1C(95%CI 0.1,1,1 ; p = 0.03)。没有证据表明教育程度与TIR / HBA1C之间的关联。结论在地区水平下测量的较高SES在GB-OSMotic COHORT中使用HBA1C和TIR的互补措施更好地实现血糖靶。鉴于TIR与HBA1C值相比,TIR在患者教育和自我管理支持中,TIR中确定的社会梯度为临床医生和决策者提供了机会,以解决T2D中的健康状况。试验登记澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验登记次审判ACTRN12616001372471,预期,日期注册4/10/2016。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号