首页> 外文OA文献 >Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) monoculture compared to an agroforestry system with Inga densiflora
【2h】

Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) monoculture compared to an agroforestry system with Inga densiflora

机译:与Inga Densiflora的农林美食系统相比,降雨分区,咖啡(Coffea Arabica L.)单一养殖中的渗透率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Partitioning of gross rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and rainfall interception was assessed in Costa Rica during two rainy seasons (mean annual rainfall of 2900 mm) in two coffee systems: (1) a monoculture (MC) and (2) an agroforestry system (AFS) including Inga densiflora as the associated shade tree species. Coffee architecture, not LAI, appeared to be the main driver of stemflow as stemflow was higher for shaded coffee plants (10.6% of incident rainfall) than for coffee plants in MC (7.2%), despite the fact that these shaded plants had lower LAI. The presence of Inga trees modified coffee architecture with shaded coffee plants presenting larger stems and branches resulting in higher coffee funneling ratio under shade. In AFS, coffee plants and trees accounted respectively for 88% and 12% of total stemflow which represented 11.8% of incident rainfall. AFS displayed larger cumulative stemflow and smaller total throughfall compared to MC. Cumulative throughfall expressed in % of the gross rainfall, differed between systems and monitoring periods and the trend showed a decrease with increasing LAI. Nevertheless, as stemflow measurement and interception loss estimation were done only during the second year of the study, the shade tree showed a low influence in increasing interception loss, as the combined LAI of coffee plants and shade trees was rather similar in AFS as that of coffee in MC. Furthermore, coffee plants accounted for the largest fraction of the interception loss in AFS as the coffee LAI was more than 3-fold that of shade trees.
机译:在两个咖啡系统中的两个雨季(平均年降雨量为2900 mm的平均降雨)的哥斯达黎加评估了累计降雨量,吞吐量截取到吞吐量,STOM流和降雨拦截在两种咖啡系统中:(1)单一种植体(MC)和(2)AFROFORESTRY系统(AFS )包括Inga Densiflora作为相关的阴影树种。咖啡建筑,而不是赖似乎是STEMFOLL的主要驱动器,因为阴影咖啡厂(10.6%的事件降雨)比MC中的咖啡厂(7.2%)更高,尽管这些阴影植物有较低的莱。 InGa树改性咖啡架的存在与呈现较大的茎和分支的阴影咖啡厂,导致阴影下的咖啡漏斗比。在AFS,咖啡植物和树木分别占总茎流量的88%和12%,占入射降雨的11.8%。与MC相比,AFS显示出较大的累积阀流和较小的总吞吐量。累积溢水以毛重降雨量的百分比表示,系统和监测期之间的差异不同,潜水趋势随着LAI的增加而降低。尽管如此,由于在研究的第二年在第二年进行了STOP流程测量和拦截损失估计,因此在增加截取损失时,遮阳树对截取损失的影响很低,因为咖啡植物和遮阳树的组合莱在AFS中相似咖啡在MC。此外,咖啡厂占AFS中拦截损失的最大一部分,因为咖啡赖超过3倍的遮荫树。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号