首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
【2h】

Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial

机译:从互联网的引导自助自助糖尿病获利的糖尿病获利的非欺骗性抑郁症吗?务实随机试验的二次分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction. Diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The aim of the study was to test whether disease-specific severity indicators moderate the treatment outcome in a 6-week minimally guided web-based self-help intervention on depression and diabetes (GET.ON Mood Enhancer Diabetes (GET.ON M.E.D.)) and to determine its effectiveness in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup. Methods. Randomized controlled trial- (RCT-) based data (N=253) comparing GET.ON M.E.D. to an online psychoeducation control group was used to test disease-specific severity indicators as predictors/moderators of a treatment outcome. Changes in depressive symptom severity and treatment response were examined in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup (CES−D>40; N=40). Results. Major depressive disorder diagnosis at the baseline (pprf6=0.01), higher levels of depression (Beck Depression Inventory II; pprpo=0.00; pprf6=0.00), and lower HbA1c (pprpo=0.04) predicted changes in depressive symptoms. No severity indicator moderated the treatment outcome. Severely depressed participants in the intervention group showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity (dprpo=2.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39-2.96) than the control condition (dprpo=0.92; 95% CI: 0.001-1.83), with a between-group effect size of dprpo=1.05 (95% CI: 0.11-1.98). Treatment response was seen in significantly more participants in the intervention (4/20; 20%) compared to the control group (0/20, 0%; χ2 2N=40=4.44; p<0.02). At the 6-month follow-up, effects were maintained for depressive symptom reduction (dpr6f=0.71; 95% CI: 0.19-1.61) but not treatment response. Conclusion. Disease-specific severity indicators were not related to a differential effectiveness of guided self-help for depression and diabetes. Clinical meaningful effects were observed in nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals, who do not need to be excluded from web-based guided self-help. However, participants should be closely monitored and referred to other treatment modalities in case of nonresponse.
机译:介绍。糖尿病型1和2型与较高的患病率和抑郁症发生有关。基于互联网的抑郁和糖尿病特异性认知行为疗法(CBT)可有效降低抑郁症状严重程度和糖尿病相关的情绪困扰。该研究的目的是测试疾病特异性严重程度指标是否在6周最微弱的网络的自助干预对抑郁症和糖尿病(Get.on情绪增强剂糖尿病(Get.on Med))中适度治疗结果并确定其在非欺骗性严重抑郁的亚组中的有效性。方法。基于随机的受控试验 - (RCT-)的数据(n = 253)比较GET.ON M.E.D.对于在线心理教育对照组,用于将疾病特异性严重性指标用于治疗结果的预测器/主持人。在非欺骗性严重抑制的亚组中检查抑郁症状严重程度和治疗反应的变化(CES-D> 40; n = 40)。结果。主要抑郁症诊断基线(PPRF6 = 0.01),较高水平的抑郁液(Beck抑郁症II; PPRPO = 0.00; PPRF6 = 0.00),下降HBA1C(PPRPO = 0.04)预测抑郁症状的变化。没有严重程度指示剂调节治疗结果。干预组的严重抑郁的参与者表现出抑郁症状严重程度的显着降低(DPRPO = 2.17,95%置信区间(CI):1.39-2.96)(DPRPO = 0.92; 95%CI:0.001-1.83) ,DPRPO = 1.05的组效果大小(95%CI:0.11-1.98)。与对照组(0/20,0%;χ22n= 40 = 4.44; p <0.02)相比,干预措施(4/20; 20%)的参与者显着观察到治疗反应。在6个月的随访中,维持抑郁症状减少的效果(DPR6F = 0.71; 95%CI:0.19-1.61)但不治疗反应。结论。疾病特异性严重程度指标与抑郁和糖尿病的引导自助的微分效果无关。在非冒险严重抑郁的个体中观察到临床有意义的效果,他们不需要被排除在基于Web的导游自助之外。但是,如果在非响应情况下,应密切监测参与者并提交其他治疗方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号