首页> 外文OA文献 >The Wraparound Puzzle: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Wraparound Fidelity Index
【2h】

The Wraparound Puzzle: Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Wraparound Fidelity Index

机译:环绕式拼图:环绕式保真度指数的验证性因素分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With its widespread use across the country and increasing evidence of its effectiveness, the wraparound process has been accepted widely as a feasible alternative to restrictive residential treatments for children with severe emotional and behavioral disorders. Yet wraparound has been implemented and conceptualized in such a variety of ways that many have begun to question whether it truly is a single definable approach. Recently, a conceptual model for wraparound was offered that included ten essential elements as the key ingredients for this approach. Subsequently, the Wraparound Fidelity Index (WFI) was designed to measure the degree to which an intervention adheres to these ten elements. The purpose of the current study was to use data collected via the WFI to provide the first empirical test of wraparound’s conceptual model. Programs providing wraparound to children with severe emotional and behavioral disorders and their families used the WFI to collect data from caregivers (n = 481), youths (n = 355; 11 to 19 years), and resource facilitators (n = 610). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the fit of a series of structural models consistent with the proposed element model of wraparound. First, CFA models were examined separately for each of the elements. Second, CFA models that represent the full wraparound model were tested, separately for each of the three informants. And third, a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted using a final CFA model including all elements (traits) and the three informants (methods). Findings supported the majority of elements and WFI items when tested separately at the first step. However, at the second step, only the youth model provided adequate fit to the data. Significant modification was necessary to yield admissible solutions for the caregiver and resource facilitator models. Finally, an inadmissible solution resulted when the three informants and revised model were tested in step three. Implications of the findings for the wraparound process, the WFI, and future research are discussed.
机译:随着其在全国范围内的广泛使用以及其有效性的不断增加的证据,这种包裹疗法已被广泛接受为对患有严重情绪和行为障碍的儿童进行限制性住院治疗的可行替代方案。然而,环绕式交易已经以多种方式实施和概念化,许多人开始质疑它是否真的是单一可定义的方式。最近,提供了一种用于环绕的概念模型,其中包括十个基本要素,作为此方法的关键要素。随后,设计了环绕保真度指数(WFI),以衡量干预措施对这十个要素的坚持程度。本研究的目的是使用通过WFI收集的数据来提供环绕概念模型的第一个实证检验。为患有严重情绪和行为障碍的儿童及其家人提供解决方案的计划使用WFI收集了看护者(n = 481),年轻人(n = 355; 11至19岁)和资源促进者(n = 610)的数据。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于测试一系列结构模型的拟合度,这些结构模型与所建议的环绕模型相符。首先,针对每个要素分别检查了CFA模型。其次,分别针对三个线人分别测试了表示完整环绕模型的CFA模型。第三,使用最终的CFA模型(包括所有要素(特征)和三个通知者(方法))进行了多特征多方法(MTMM)分析。在第一步进行单独测试时,结果支持大多数元素和WFI项目。但是,在第二步中,只有青年模型为数据提供了足够的拟合度。必须进行重大修改才能为看护者和资源促进者模型提供可接受的解决方案。最后,在第三步中测试了三个信息提供者和修订后的模型后,导致出现不允许的解决方案。讨论了发现结果对包装过程,WFI和未来研究的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Suter Jesse;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号