首页> 外文OA文献 >Empirical competence-testing: A psychometric examination of the German version of the Emotional Competence Inventory
【2h】

Empirical competence-testing: A psychometric examination of the German version of the Emotional Competence Inventory

机译:经验能力测试:德国版情绪能力量表的心理测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The “Emotional Competence Inventory“ (ECI 2.0) by Goleman and Boyatzis assesses emotional intelligence (EI) in organizational context by means of 72 items in 4 clusters (self-awareness, self- management, social awareness, social skills) which at large consist of 18 competencies. Our study examines the psychometric properties of the first German translation of this instrument in two different surveys (N = 236). If all items are included in reliability analysis the ECI is reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha = .90), whereas the reliability of the four sub dimensions is much smaller (Alpha = .62 - .81). For 43 items the corrected item-total correlation with its own scale is higher than correlations with the other three clusters. Convergent validity was examined by using another EI instrument (Wong & Law, 2002). We found a significant correlation between the two instruments (r = .41). The German version of the ECI seems to be quite useful, although the high reliability is achieved by a large number of items. Possibilities of improvement are discussed.
机译:Goleman和Boyatzis的“情绪能力清单”(ECI 2.0)通过4个类别(自我意识,自我管理,社会意识,社交技能)中的72个项目评估了组织背景下的情绪智力(EI)。 18个能力。我们的研究在两次不同的调查中(N = 236)检查了该仪器首次德语翻译的心理计量学特性。如果将所有项目都包括在可靠性分析中,则ECI是可靠的(Cronbach的Alpha = .90),而四个子维度的可靠性要小得多(Alpha = .62-.81)。对于43个项目,其自身规模的校正项目-总相关性高于与其他三个聚类的相关性。收敛效度通过使用另一项EI工具进行了检验(Wong&Law,2002)。我们发现两种仪器之间存在显着相关性(r = 0.41)。 ECI的德语版本似乎很有用,尽管许多项目都可以实现很高的可靠性。讨论了改进的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号