首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: an experimental and clinical study.

【2h】

Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: an experimental and clinical study.

机译：常规和腹腔镜修复穿孔性消化性溃疡的比较：实验和临床研究。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

by Lau Wan Yee, Joseph.

机译：约瑟夫·刘婉仪

著录项

作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 1995
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Clinical application comparison between laparoscopic repair and conventional open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer [J] . Man-Xu Li 海南医科大学学报（英文版） . 2016,第016期

机译：腹腔镜修补术与常规开放性修补十二指肠溃疡的临床应用比较
2. A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergent repair of perforated peptic ulcers [J] . Davenport Daniel L., Ueland Walker R., Kumar Shyanie, Surgical Endoscopy . 2019,第3期

机译：腹腔镜与开放式溃疡性溃疡的短期成果的比较
3. Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer [J] . Kugan V., Mahadevan D., Htoo H. S., Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association . 2015,第7期

机译：穿孔性消化性溃疡开放和腹腔镜修复的比较
4. Predicting the Length of Hospital Stay After Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer [C] . José Machado, Ana Catarina Cardoso, Inês Gomes, International Conference on Information Technology and Systems . 2019

机译：预测穿孔消化性溃疡手术后的住院时间待命
5. Surgical Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Laparoscopic vs. Open Approach [D] . Vakayil, Victor. 2019

机译：穿孔消化溃疡的外科修复：腹腔镜与开放方法

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

客服微信
服务号