首页> 外文OA文献 >Dropping the Captain: the short but eventful editorship of Louis McRedmond at the Irish Independent, 1968-70.
【2h】

Dropping the Captain: the short but eventful editorship of Louis McRedmond at the Irish Independent, 1968-70.

机译:放弃船长:路易斯·麦克雷德蒙德(Louis mcRedmond)在爱尔兰独立报(1968-70)的短暂但多事的编辑。

摘要

RECENT EVENTS BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER the publication of Lord Justice Leveson’s Report into regulatory aspects of the newspaper industry in Britain have tended to concentrate on ethical and professional issues as manifested in the practices of a substantial number of British national papers. Of less immediate concern – but, it could be argued, of some significance in the longer term – has been the relationship between proprietors and editors. It can reasonably be suggested that because the issues surrounding journalism practice are at least as cultural as they are legal or regulatory, and because culture within organisations flows down from the top rather than seeps up from the bottom, these relationships are deserving of further study than they have received to date. In the specific British context, the role of the effective proprietor of the News International group of newspapers has been evident in two sharply contrasting ways: in Mr Murdoch’s doughty, if behind-the-scenes, defence of Rebekah Wade, until the pressure of events forced her resignation from the editorship of the News of the World; and in the extraordinary removal of the editor of The Times, James Harding, and his replacement by James Witherow – actions carried out without the prior approval of that newspaper’s independent directors, whose rights to oversee and approve such dismissals and appointments had been specifically written into the agreement by which Mr. Murdoch had assumed ownership and control of these newspapers.udThe appointment and dismissal of editors of national newspapers is, with few exceptions, a process remarkable, on either side of the Irish Sea, for its opacity. As important questions of reputation are involved, this is perhaps to be expected; but it is still remarkable that an industry which demands so much transparency of others manages, in this respect at least, to keep its cards so close to its chest. This essay is an attempt to elucidate and document, on the basis of a previously unavailable collection of papers, the issues involved in such a process in the case of the appointment and dismissal of one Irish national newspaper editor almost half a century ago. Whether they are relevant to today’s controversies is for others to decide.
机译:列夫森大法官在英国报业监管方面发表的报告前后,都发生了最近的事件,这往往集中在道德和专业问题上,这在许多英国国家报纸的实践中都得到了体现。业主和编辑者之间的关系是不太紧迫的问题,但是,从长远来看,这可能具有某些意义。可以合理地建议,因为围绕新闻实践的问题至少与法律或法规一样具有文化性,并且由于组织内部的文化从上而下而不是从下而上渗透,因此这些关系值得进一步研究。他们已经收到了。在特定的英国背景下,新闻国际报纸集团的有效所有人的作用在两种截然不同的方式中得到了明显体现:默多克先生的强壮性(如果是幕后作风)则是对丽贝卡·韦德的辩护,直到事件的压力。迫使她辞去《世界新闻》的编辑职务;并特别罢免了《泰晤士报》的编辑詹姆斯·哈丁,并由詹姆斯·威瑟洛(James Witherow)接任–未经该报独立董事事先批准而采取的行动,该独立董事监督和批准此类解雇和任命的权利已明确写入默多克先生拥有这些报纸的所有权和控制权的协议。 ud几乎没有例外,任命和解雇国家报纸的编辑在爱尔兰海的两岸都是一个不透明的过程。由于涉及声誉的重要问题,这也许是可以预料的。但是,值得注意的是,至少在这方面,要求别人如此透明的行业设法将其名片保持得如此之近。本文是试图根据以前没有的文献来阐明和记录在大约半个世纪前任命和解雇一名爱尔兰国家报纸编辑的情况下与该过程有关的问题。它们是否与今天的争议相关,由其他人决定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Horgan John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号