首页> 外文OA文献 >Strategic Operations Research and the Edelman Prize Finalist Applications 1989-1998
【2h】

Strategic Operations Research and the Edelman Prize Finalist Applications 1989-1998

机译:战略运营研究和Edelman奖入围申请1989-1998

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an earlier study we examined the available evidence on the Edelman Prize finalist applications 1989-1998. This study concluded that 13 of the 42 private sector applications provide examples of strategic operations research (SOR) when SOR is defined as operations research that creates a sustainable competitive advantage. In a follow-up study we tested our classifications, gathering longitudinal information on the continued success of the Edelman applications. We contacted people who were familiar with all the private sector applications that were Edelman finalists 1989-1996 and had at least five years of history since the competition. We describe the post-Edelman history of these applications and use this data to reassess their strategic role. We found that the longitudinal data provides evidence to support our original classification, but also suggests that several additional applications were more strategic than was originally apparent. We conclude that almost 60% (20 of 34) of these applications created a sustainable competitive advantage for their firms and provide examples of SOR.
机译:在较早的研究中,我们研究了1989-1998年爱德曼奖入围申请的可用证据。这项研究得出的结论是,当将SOR定义为创造可持续竞争优势的运营研究时,42个私营部门应用程序中有13个提供了战略运营研究(SOR)的示例。在后续研究中,我们测试了我们的分类,收集了有关Edelman应用程序持续成功的纵向信息。我们联系了熟悉所有私营部门申请的人,这些申请是1989-1996年的爱德曼决赛入围者,距比赛已有至少五年的历史。我们描述了这些应用程序的爱德曼后历史,并使用这些数据重新评估了它们的战略作用。我们发现,纵向数据为支持我们的原始分类提供了证据,但同时也表明,其他几个应用程序比原始表述更具战略意义。我们得出的结论是,这些应用中将近60%(34个中的20个)为其公司创造了可持续的竞争优势,并提供了SOR的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号