首页> 外文OA文献 >Fishery share systems and ITQ markets: who should pay for quota?
【2h】

Fishery share systems and ITQ markets: who should pay for quota?

机译:渔业分享系统和ITQ市场:谁应该支付配额?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although, in most commercial fisheries, fishing crews are remunerated under a share system, the implications of share systems for ITQ markets have received relatively little attention. In this paper we explore the impact of extending crew shares of vessel operating costs to include the cost of quota. We find that efficiency is maintained as long as any share system is adopted across the entire fleet. Making crews pay a share of quota costs, however, simply inflates the quota price at their expense: at market equilibrium the vessel owner’s total profit share is unaffected. We also consider the outcome if only net purchasers of quota involve crews in the cost of quota. Here, all vessel owners benefit, while all crews see a reduction in their earnings. These results are illustrated with a simple numerical example. The implications for resource rent capture policies are briefly considered.
机译:尽管在大多数商业渔业中,捕捞船员是在股份制下获得报酬的,但是股份制对ITQ市场的影响却很少受到关注。在本文中,我们探讨了扩大船员的船舶运营成本份额(包括配额成本)的影响。我们发现,只要整个机队采用任何共享系统,就可以保持效率。但是,让船员支付一定份额的配额成本,只是夸大了配额价格,而自己付出了代价:在市场均衡时,船东的总利润份额不受影响。如果只有配额净购买者让机组人员参与配额成本,我们还将考虑结果。在这里,所有船东都将从中受益,而所有船员的收入都将减少。用一个简单的数值示例说明了这些结果。简要考虑了资源租金收取政策的含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hatcher Aaron;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号