首页> 外文OA文献 >An Evaluation of Touch and Pressure-Based Scrolling and Haptic Feedback for In-car Touchscreens
【2h】

An Evaluation of Touch and Pressure-Based Scrolling and Haptic Feedback for In-car Touchscreens

机译:基于触摸和压力的滚动和触觉反馈对车载触摸屏的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An in-car study was conducted to examine different input techniques for list-based scrolling tasks and the effectiveness of haptic feedback for in-car touchscreens. The use of physical switchgear on centre consoles is decreasing which allows designers to develop new ways to interact with in-car applications. However, these new methods need to be evaluated to ensure they are usable. Therefore, three input techniques were tested: direct scrolling, pressure-based scrolling and scrolling using onscreen buttons on a touchscreen. The results showed that direct scrolling was less accurate than using onscreen buttons and pressure input, but took almost half the time when compared to the onscreen buttons and was almost three times quicker than pressure input. Vibrotactile feedback did not improve input performance but was preferred by the users. Understanding the speed vs. accuracy trade-off between these input techniques will allow better decisions when designing safer in-car interfaces for scrolling applications.
机译:进行了一项车载研究,以检查基于列表的滚动任务的不同输入技术以及车载触摸屏的触觉反馈的有效性。中央控制台上物理开关设备的使用正在减少,这使设计师可以开发与车载应用程序交互的新方法。但是,需要评估这些新方法以确保它们可用。因此,测试了三种输入技术:直接滚动,基于压力的滚动以及使用触摸屏上的屏幕按钮进行滚动。结果表明,直接滚动不如使用屏幕上的按钮和压力输入准确,但是与屏幕上的按钮相比,它花费了几乎一半的时间,并且比压力输入快了三倍。触觉反馈不能改善输入性能,但受到用户的欢迎。在为滚动应用程序设计更安全的车载界面时,了解这些输入技术之间的速度与准确性之间的权衡将允许做出更好的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号