首页> 外文OA文献 >How do trends in mortality inequalities by deprivation and education in Scotland and England Wales compare? A repeat cross-sectional study
【2h】

How do trends in mortality inequalities by deprivation and education in Scotland and England Wales compare? A repeat cross-sectional study

机译:苏格兰和英格兰和威尔士的贫困和教育造成的死亡率不平等趋势如何比较?重复横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To compare the trends in mortality inequalities by educational attainment with trends using area deprivation.ududSetting: Scotland and England & Wales (E&W).ududParticipants: All people resident in Scotland and E&W between 1981 and 2011 aged 35–79 years.ududPrimary outcome measures: Absolute inequalities (measured using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII)) and relative inequalities (measured using the Relative Index of Inequality (RII)) in all-cause mortality.ududResults: Relative inequalities in mortality by area deprivation have consistently increased for men and women in Scotland and E&W between 1981–1983 and 2010–2012. Absolute inequalities increased for men and women in Scotland, and for women in E&W, between 1981–1983 and 2000–2002 before subsequently falling. For men in E&W, absolute inequalities were more stable until 2000–2002 before a subsequent decline. Both absolute and relative inequalities were consistently higher in men and in Scotland. These trends contrast markedly with the reported declines in mortality inequalities by educational attainment and apparent improvement of Scotland’s inequalities with those in E&W.ududConclusions: Trends in health inequalities differ when assessed using different measures of socioeconomic status, reflecting either genuinely variable trends in relation to different aspects of social stratification or varying error or bias. There are particular issues with the educational attainment data in Great Britain prior to 2001 that make these education-based estimates less certain.
机译:目的:比较按学历划分的死亡率不平等趋势与使用区域剥夺的趋势。 ud ud背景:苏格兰和英格兰及威尔士(E&W)。 ud ud参与者:1981年至2011年间,居住在苏格兰和E&W的所有年龄在35岁的人–79年。 ud ud主要结果指标:全因死亡率中的绝对不平等(使用不平等斜率指数(SII)衡量)和相对不平等(使用不平等相对指数(RII)衡量)。 :1981年至1983年至2010年至2012年之间,苏格兰和E&W男女按地区剥夺死亡率的相对不平等现象持续增加。 1981年至1983年至2000年至2002年之间,苏格兰男女的绝对不平等现象加剧,随后逐渐下降。对于从事E&W工作的男性,绝对不平等现象在2000-2002年之前更为稳定,随后有所下降。男性和苏格兰的绝对不平等和相对不平等现象都一直较高。这些趋势与报告的受教育程度导致的死亡率不平等下降以及苏格兰与E&W的不平等现象明显改善形成了鲜明的对比。结论:使用不同的社会经济地位衡量方法评估的健康不平等趋势有所不同,反映出无论是真实的还是人口变化的趋势与社会分层或变化的错误或偏见的不同方面的关系。 2001年之前英国的受教育程度数据存在一些特殊问题,这些问题使这些基于教育的估计值不太确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号